Higher dielectric constant : better insulator

AI Thread Summary
A higher dielectric constant does not necessarily indicate a better insulator, as electrical conductivity is the key factor in determining a material's insulating properties. For instance, while pure water has a high dielectric constant of 80, it remains a good conductor due to impurities, particularly in seawater. Air, with a dielectric constant of 1, exemplifies a very effective insulator despite its low dielectric value. High dielectric constants can slow light propagation and enable polarization, which allows energy storage in capacitors through dipole moments. Understanding these concepts clarifies the relationship between dielectric properties and electrical conductivity.
dharm0us
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Higher dielectric constant means better insulator.
Water has a dielectric constant of 8, which is enormous(according to Walter Lewin),
but it still is a very good conductor of electricity, why?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1) The dielectric constant of pure water is 80, not 8.
2) impure water, especially seawater, is a good conductor (think electrolysis of hydrogen and oxygen).
 
Dielectric constant is not an indicator of being a good insulator. The electrical conductivity is what gives a material it's properties relating to being an insulator or conductor. Take a look at air, it has a dielectric constant of unity, yet it is a very good insulator.

A high dielectric constant will result in a slower propagation of light through the medium and it allows for polarization of the medium. The polarization is the ability for the molecules or atoms in the medium to slightly separate to become dipole moments in the presence of an applied electric field. This has the effect of lowering the apparent magnitude of the electric field, but the energy lost in the field is stored in the polarization of the material. This helps make a dielectric effective in improving capacitors since you can store energy in the polarizing of the dielectric as well as in the voltage induced by the stored charges.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top