Higher dielectric constant : better insulator

AI Thread Summary
A higher dielectric constant does not necessarily indicate a better insulator, as electrical conductivity is the key factor in determining a material's insulating properties. For instance, while pure water has a high dielectric constant of 80, it remains a good conductor due to impurities, particularly in seawater. Air, with a dielectric constant of 1, exemplifies a very effective insulator despite its low dielectric value. High dielectric constants can slow light propagation and enable polarization, which allows energy storage in capacitors through dipole moments. Understanding these concepts clarifies the relationship between dielectric properties and electrical conductivity.
dharm0us
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Higher dielectric constant means better insulator.
Water has a dielectric constant of 8, which is enormous(according to Walter Lewin),
but it still is a very good conductor of electricity, why?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1) The dielectric constant of pure water is 80, not 8.
2) impure water, especially seawater, is a good conductor (think electrolysis of hydrogen and oxygen).
 
Dielectric constant is not an indicator of being a good insulator. The electrical conductivity is what gives a material it's properties relating to being an insulator or conductor. Take a look at air, it has a dielectric constant of unity, yet it is a very good insulator.

A high dielectric constant will result in a slower propagation of light through the medium and it allows for polarization of the medium. The polarization is the ability for the molecules or atoms in the medium to slightly separate to become dipole moments in the presence of an applied electric field. This has the effect of lowering the apparent magnitude of the electric field, but the energy lost in the field is stored in the polarization of the material. This helps make a dielectric effective in improving capacitors since you can store energy in the polarizing of the dielectric as well as in the voltage induced by the stored charges.
 
This is from Griffiths' Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, page 352. I am trying to calculate the divergence of the Maxwell stress tensor. The tensor is given as ##T_{ij} =\epsilon_0 (E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} E^2)+\frac 1 {\mu_0}(B_iB_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} B^2)##. To make things easier, I just want to focus on the part with the electrical field, i.e. I want to find the divergence of ##E_{ij}=E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij}E^2##. In matrix form, this tensor should look like this...
Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'
Please can anyone either:- (1) point me to a derivation of the perpendicular force (Fy) between two very long parallel wires carrying steady currents utilising the formula of Gauss for the force F along the line r between 2 charges? Or alternatively (2) point out where I have gone wrong in my method? I am having problems with calculating the direction and magnitude of the force as expected from modern (Biot-Savart-Maxwell-Lorentz) formula. Here is my method and results so far:- This...
Back
Top