HNMR & CNMR infirmation to identify a compound

  • Thread starter Thread starter FARADAY JR
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on identifying a compound with the formula C7H10O2 using HNMR and 13C NMR data. The provided HNMR indicates the presence of a methyl group adjacent to a carbonyl, suggesting either a methyl ketone or an acetate group. The 13C NMR data shows various peaks, but there are questions regarding the absence of splitting patterns and the interpretation of the C-O signal. Clarifications are sought about the nature of the carbonyl and whether the missing data is intentional to increase difficulty. Overall, the participants emphasize the need for complete data to accurately deduce the compound's structure.
FARADAY JR
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
I was given a structure C7H10O2 AND i WAS GIVEN THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION
HNMR:
1.16(3H,SINGLET) - RCH2R
2.21(2H,SINGLET)- RC=OCH3

13C NMR:
216.25(SINGLET)- R-C=O-R
52.57(SINGLET) -C-O
34.51 (TRIPLET) RCH2R
20.22 (QUARTET) RCH3

i identified all the functional groups in the compound but having a problem putting the structure together so any help I would truly appreciate it.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I assume the 13C information is taken from an experiment without heteronuclear decoupling. Generally, 13C is performed with the proton decoupler on which gives only singlet type spectra. I also assume you've transposed the number of hydrogens in the 1H data you have given us.

You have a methyl group next to a carbonyl carbon which means you either have a methyl ketone or an acetate group in your structure (CH3C=OR, R=O- ). An aldehyde would require that your compound were the trivial compound ethanal which isn't right for the given empirical formula. How would you distinguish between a methyl ketone and an acetate? Where does the ketone carbonyl absorb in the 13C spectrum? How about acetate?

You have a C-O identified so is it an ether or part of the acetate group? Why wouldn't you observe a splitting pattern for this carbon? Is this carbon tertiary or was the splitting information left out for this bit of information? (I don't know the answer to that) You don't have all of the 1H data or all of the 13C data for this compound. Is the remaining data deliberately omitted to make this more of a challenge for you?
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

Similar threads

Back
Top