MHB Hoax paper published in some journal... hilarious

  • Thread starter Thread starter caffeinemachine
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Journal Paper
AI Thread Summary
A software called Mathgen has generated a math paper that was accepted for publication in a journal, sparking discussions about its authenticity and implications. The paper, which can be accessed via a provided link, is noted for its originality and interesting results, potentially inspiring further research. It is described as well-written and adequately referenced, suggesting it meets academic standards. The discussion highlights the humorous aspect of a computer-generated paper being taken seriously, with a recommendation for its acceptance in the Journal for Algebra and Number Theory, indicating possible embarrassment within the peer review process.
caffeinemachine
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
799
Reaction score
15
Physics news on Phys.org
Re: hoax paper published in some journal.. hilarious

I have gone through the paper. It is a good paper. In my view the results obtained are original, new and interesting. This paper may trigger further research in the direction of work.

Clarity: This paper is well-written and well-presented.

Literature: The authors’ references to the literature seem adequate.

Interest: Readers of the journal will find this paper interesting.

Recommendation: I recommend that this paper be accepted for publication in the Journal for Algebra and Number Theory Academia.
 
I image there are a few red faces in the Peer Review department. :mad:

-Dan
 
This thread only works as a summary from the original source: List of STEM Masterworks in Physics, Mechanics, Electrodynamics... The original thread got very long and somewhat hard to read so I have compiled the recommendations from that thread in an online (Google Drive) spreadsheet. SUMMARY Permits are granted so you can make comments on the spreadsheet but I'll initially be the only one capable of edition. This is to avoid the possibility of someone deleting everything either by mistake...
Back
Top