Homogeneous Laplace's Equation

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on solving the homogeneous Laplace's equation, specifically uxx + uyy = 0, with boundary conditions u(x,0) = u(x,π) = 0 and u(0,y) = 0, ux(5,y) = 3sin(y) - 5sin(4y). The solution involves the method of separation of variables, leading to the conclusion that the solution u(x,y) should be u(x,y) = (3/cosh(5))(siny)(sinh(x)) - (5/4sinh(20))(sin(4y))(sinh(4x)). However, the book's answer omits a factor of 4 in the denominator of the second term, indicating a potential printing error.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Laplace's equation and boundary value problems
  • Familiarity with Fourier series and their applications
  • Knowledge of separation of variables technique in partial differential equations
  • Basic concepts of hyperbolic functions, specifically sinh and cosh
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the method of separation of variables in greater detail
  • Learn about Fourier series expansions for different boundary conditions
  • Explore hyperbolic functions and their properties in solving PDEs
  • Investigate common errors in textbook solutions and how to identify them
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in mathematics, particularly those focusing on partial differential equations, boundary value problems, and Fourier analysis.

rizardon
Messages
19
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


uxx+uyy=0
u(x,0)=u(x,pie)=0
u(0,y)=0
ux(5,y)=3siny-5sin4y


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Using separable method I get
Y"-kY= 0 and X"+kX=0

For Case 1 and Case 2 where k>0 and k=0 there are no eigenvalues

So Case 3 k<0 gives
Y=ccos(sqrk x y) + dsin(sqrk x y)
y=0, then c=0
y=pie, then dsin(pie x sqrk)=0
k= -n2, Yn=sin(ny)
X"-n2X=0, X=ccosh(nx)+dsinh(nx)

u(x,y)= summation (from n=1 to n=infinity) sin(ny)[cncosh(nx)+dnsinh(nx)]

u(0,y)= summation (from n=1 to n=infinity) cnsin(ny)

Using Fourier's Series to expand 0, I got 0 so cn is 0

ux(x,y)= summation (from n=1 to n=infinity) sin(ny)[dnncosh(nx)]
ux(x,0)= summation (from n=1 to n=infinity) sin(ny)[dnn]

Using Fourier's Series to expand 3siny-5sin4y, I also got 0 so dn is 0 as well

Therefore u(x,y)=0

However the answer given in the book is

u(x,y)=(3/cosh5)(siny)(sinhx) - (5/cosh20)(sin4y)(sinh4x)

I realized that the book didn't used Fourier's Series but compared the coefficients of the two equations instead. But my question is what happened to the n because if we compare the coefficients aren't we supposed to get

[3/ncosh(5n)] n=1 so we get [3/cosh(5)]
[-5/nsinh(5n)] n=4 so we get [-5/4sinh(20)] so u(x,y) should be

[3/cosh(5)](siny)(sinhx) - [5/4sinh(20)](sin4y)(sinh4x)

Did I do it correctly or is it just a printing error?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
rizardon said:

However the answer given in the book is

u(x,y)=(3/cosh5)(siny)(sinhx) - (5/cosh20)(sin4y)(sinh4x)



They left out a 4 multiplying the cosh(20) in the denominator
[3/cosh(5)](siny)(sinhx) - [5/4sinh(20)](sin4y)(sinh4x)

And you meant cosh(20) instead of sinh(20). They just dropped a 4.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K