Horizontal Force in Bottom Member of a Truss

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the horizontal force in the bottom member of a truss using principles from Statics. The reactions at points A and B are both 5 kN. The confusion arises from the division of cos(60°) by cos(30°) to determine the force in member AC. The correct approach involves recognizing the symmetry of the frame and applying trigonometric relationships to resolve forces, leading to the conclusion that the horizontal force in member AC is 2.88 kN.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Statics principles
  • Proficiency in trigonometric functions and their applications in force resolution
  • Ability to draw and analyze Free Body Diagrams (FBDs)
  • Familiarity with truss analysis and symmetry in structural mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of Free Body Diagrams in truss analysis
  • Learn about force resolution using trigonometric identities in structural engineering
  • Explore the concept of symmetry in truss systems and its implications on force distribution
  • Investigate the use of force triangles in solving static equilibrium problems
USEFUL FOR

Engineering students preparing for the FE exam, structural engineers, and anyone involved in analyzing truss systems and static forces.

CSawyer717
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hello,
I've been studying for the FE, and this question in the Statics section of the review I am going through has really tripped me up for some reason. I understand Statics, and how to determine forces in X and Y directions, determining X and Y components using trig, etc, etc..

Maybe I am overthinking this whole thing, but for some reason this problem has me awfully confused. it's in two parts; first part (not shown) just asks what rxns at A and B are (Ra=Rb=5 kN)
second part (in attached image) asks for the horizontal force in the bottom component. I have the solution there, as well - I just have no idea how the solution was reached. what confuses me, is why do you divide cos(60)/cos(30)? I understand where the 60 and 30 degree angles are from - just not sure why you're dividing the two to get the answer.
any help would be greatly appreciated!
 

Attachments

  • statics_truss.PNG
    statics_truss.PNG
    69.7 KB · Views: 595
Physics news on Phys.org
CSawyer717 said:
Hello,
I've been studying for the FE, and this question in the Statics section of the review I am going through has really tripped me up for some reason. I understand Statics, and how to determine forces in X and Y directions, determining X and Y components using trig, etc, etc..

Maybe I am overthinking this whole thing, but for some reason this problem has me awfully confused. it's in two parts; first part (not shown) just asks what rxns at A and B are (Ra=Rb=5 kN)
second part (in attached image) asks for the horizontal force in the bottom component. I have the solution there, as well - I just have no idea how the solution was reached. what confuses me, is why do you divide cos(60)/cos(30)? I understand where the 60 and 30 degree angles are from - just not sure why you're dividing the two to get the answer.
any help would be greatly appreciated!
Have you tried drawing a free body diagram of the structure?
 
I have, and I'm still not understanding why you need to divide cos(60)/cos(30). Also, is that 10/2 from the one 10kN vertical force being split between the two members AC and BC? so when you draw your FBD about point A, you're only seeing half of that 10 kN force? i understand the cos(60) is the X component in member AC. I just get hung up where the cos(30) comes into play. do you need to determine the force in member AC from both, point A and point C? and that's where the 30 degree angle comes into play?

very frustrating; at first glance, it seemed like a simple problem - i can't tell if i am over thinking everything or what.
 
CSawyer717 said:
I have, and I'm still not understanding why you need to divide cos(60)/cos(30). Also, is that 10/2 from the one 10kN vertical force being split between the two members AC and BC? so when you draw your FBD about point A, you're only seeing half of that 10 kN force? i understand the cos(60) is the X component in member AC. I just get hung up where the cos(30) comes into play. do you need to determine the force in member AC from both, point A and point C? and that's where the 30 degree angle comes into play?

very frustrating; at first glance, it seemed like a simple problem - i can't tell if i am over thinking everything or what.
You need to lay out what the individual parts of the expression are telling you. I think you are just confused seeing several parts rolled up into one expression.

You have correctly discerned that (10/2) comes from applying symmetry to the frame.

What force is given by the expression 5 / cos (30°) ?
 
SteamKing said:
You need to lay out what the individual parts of the expression are telling you. I think you are just confused seeing several parts rolled up into one expression.

You have correctly discerned that (10/2) comes from applying symmetry to the frame.

What force is given by the expression 5 / cos (30°) ?

would that be the vertical component of AC if you made a FBD around point C? So, since you can just apply symmetry, you're able to assume only a 5kN downward force at C, and a force in member AC. then solving for Fac, you come up with Fac=5/cos(30), resulting in Fac=5.77kN. then summing horizontal forces about point A, you get Fab=5.77cos(60), Fab=2.88

oh, wow. you're a magician. thank you very much for the help! there was a ton of overthinking and confusion from just seeing the solution there..
 
CSawyer717 said:
would that be the vertical component of AC if you made a FBD around point C? So, since you can just apply symmetry, you're able to assume only a 5kN downward force at C, and a force in member AC. then solving for Fac, you come up with Fac=5/cos(30), resulting in Fac=5.77kN. then summing horizontal forces about point A, you get Fab=5.77cos(60), Fab=2.88

oh, wow. you're a magician. thank you very much for the help! there was a ton of overthinking and confusion from just seeing the solution there..
Sometimes, just laying out a force triangle can answer many questions.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K