Hot gas expansion rate into outer space

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the expansion rate of hot rocket exhaust gases into outer space and its implications for thrust direction and impact on surfaces, specifically in the context of moon landings. Participants explore the relevance of gas expansion after leaving the nozzle and its potential effects on landing scenarios.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions how fast hot rocket exhaust gases expand into empty space and whether this expansion affects impulse direction within the nozzle exit angle.
  • Another participant asserts that the expansion rate of gases after leaving the nozzle is irrelevant to the thrust provided by the rocket, suggesting it is an interesting fact but not practically significant.
  • A different participant argues that the expansion rate could be relevant in discussions about moon landings, claiming that gases would impact the moon's surface quickly enough to challenge skepticism about landing evidence.
  • Concerns are raised about the relevance of discussing moon landing hoax theories, with a warning that such topics are not permitted in the forum.
  • One participant expresses frustration over perceived censorship and a desire for open-minded discussion about phenomena in outer space, including the moon.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the relevance of gas expansion rates to rocket thrust or moon landing discussions. Multiple competing views remain, particularly regarding the implications of gas behavior in different contexts.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved assumptions about the conditions under which gas expansion is considered and its effects on surfaces. The discussion also touches on the sensitivity of certain topics within the forum.

Jay Hill
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Good Morning Sirs,
it seems to be surprisingly hard to get the numbers of a mystery:

How fast expand hot rocket exhaust gases into empty space?
Of course aside from its exit velocity!
Does the expansion interfere with the impulse direction?
I.e. is the impulse omnidirectional effective within the engine nozzle exit angle of assumed 90deg.
(or even beyond that)?
Can't hardly wait!
Jay
 
Science news on Phys.org
Not sure I really understand you question fully, but the expansion rate of the gasses once they have left the exhaust nozzle is irrelevant to the thrust that they provide for the rocket so it might be an interesting fact to know for some reason but it is does not matter for any practical purpose.
 
It IS irrelevant - unless you anticipate certain things underneath your engine nozzle.
Now it's going to disable a certain moon landing skepticism around some friends of mine.
The argument here: The gases hit the moon ground (at 10ft height) in less then 2ms
(at 15,000ft/s)- allegedly quick enough to outgun the immediate expansion of the stream
(with a force of at least 1,500kp). It would have inevitably left a distinctive impact
on the flour light dust underneath the firing descend engine cone - easily to see on the scores of images.
IMHO the expansion rate actually EXCEEDS the stream velocity and distributes the gas-pressure
evenly everywhere - with a resulting low exposure of the dust surface below.
I'd be grateful for a proof.
 
First you ask about something happening in outer space, now you are talking about the surface of the moon.

What is it you really want to know?
 
Note that moon landing hoax theories are a banned topic on PF. If this goes in that direction, this thread will quickly close or disappear.
 
Dear Sirs,
as hopeless American by heart and mind I'm utterly surprised to find here - out of all places -
a institutional THOUGHT CONTROL.
The dedicative discussion about some ridiculous "sci"-fi" movies
surely is more easy to do compared with the real and most strange phenomena
men kind encountered in the outer space - which includes to me
the Earth moon because of its nature.
Admittedly its more funny to be with BASICALLY open minded people.
Therefore: By by and God bless you!
Jay Hill
PS Why do I have to think on Bob Dylan?
I hear him sing: The Disease Of Conceit...
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
8K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
7K
  • Sticky
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
70K
Replies
14
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K