How and why can multiplication combine physical quantities?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around understanding how multiplication combines physical quantities to form new physical quantities in equations. Participants explore the conceptual and mathematical implications of multiplication in the context of physics, including its relationship to physical phenomena and the interpretation of units.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses a desire to understand why multiplication combines physical quantities, questioning what multiplication does to these quantities.
  • Another participant explains multiplication in terms of counting and area, suggesting it represents how many times a quantity is present.
  • Some participants argue that multiplication is an abstract operation that does not "do" anything in the real world, emphasizing that mathematical relationships describe observed relationships between physical quantities.
  • There is a discussion about the meaning of units and how they relate to physical quantities, with one participant noting that unit analysis is crucial in problem-solving.
  • One participant suggests that rather than forming new quantities, one should understand physical quantities as being proportional to each other, using examples like work and velocity.
  • Another participant mentions that in some contexts, multiplication can be described as "applied over," but this does not universally apply to all physical relationships.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature of multiplication in physical contexts. Some argue that multiplication has a specific meaning in terms of physical relationships, while others contend that it is merely an abstract mathematical operation without inherent physical implications. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the interpretation of multiplication in combining physical quantities.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the complexity of understanding units and their relationships, noting that some mathematical operations may not have immediate physical interpretations. There is also mention of the limitations of applying certain descriptions universally across different physical contexts.

Haris045
Messages
2
Reaction score
2
TL;DR
how and why can multiplication combine physical quantities to form a new physical quantity, to make an equation?
I am on a journey to not just understand how to manipulate physics equations but to understand why they work , and how they describe physical phenomena.

I understand how division combines physical quantities. I have this much physical quantity 'per' this much physical quantity. It puts 2 physical quantities in a ratio to describe a physical phenome e.g. velocity=distance/time, It makes sense.

I understand what multiplication does numerically. But I don't understand how it can combine physical quantities to form a new one.

Intuitively I see that multiplication means 'applied over' e.g. W=F*d a 'force applied over a distance' or d=s*t 'a speed applied over a certain time'. mass = density*volume 'a density applied over a volume'. But why

1)So my first question is why does multiplication have this property of combining physical quantities and forming a new one, what is the multiplication doing to these physical quantities.

2)How does the multiplication relate back to the physical phenomena (how can it combine 2 physical quantities to describe a physical phenomena using an equation)

3)what does it show in an equation (about how it is combing the physical quantises to form a new on) , what does it mean in the equation , what is it doing to the physical quantises to form a new one?

4)so I can see that multiplication means 'applied over' but why does it mean this?

Thank you for the help and sorry if I am being ignorant.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Lnewqban
Physics news on Phys.org
For whole numbers, it means how many "times" you have a quantity. So if I count a quantity of "A things" "6 times", I get 6*A of the things. Think about a 2-d rectangle made up of a whole number of smaller rectangles. There are "A" rectangles laid out in a row, and "6" rows of those A rectangles...

EDIT -- similar to images like this one:

1662407159128.png

https://mathisvisual.com/wp-content...ompts.129-7-groups-of-5-squares-1024x576.jpeg
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: topsquark
Haris045 said:
Summary: how and why can multiplication combine physical quantities to form a new physical quantity, to make an equation?

I understand how division combines physical quantities. I have this much physical quantity 'per' this much physical quantity. It puts 2 physical quantities in a ratio to describe a physical phenome e.g. velocity=distance/time, It makes sense.
To continue your example, if velocity is distance per unit time, then the distance covered in a time T would be velocity times T. That should be obvious to anyone who has traveled in a vehicle. It should also be obvious to you that if your pay per hour is $15.00, your pay after working 10 hours would be $150.00. Note that hourly pay is a different physical quantity from total pay with different units.

Carrying that one step farther, if acceleration is net force per unit mass, then the net force on a 10-kg mass with acceleration 15 m/s2 would be 150 N. $$F_{\text{net}}=ma \Leftrightarrow a=\frac{F_{\text{net}}}{m}.$$You can do this with all products, so if you understand division, you should be able to understand multiplication.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PeroK and topsquark
Haris045 said:
1)So my first question is why does multiplication have this property of combining physical quantities and forming a new one
It doesn't. The mathematical relationships we write describe relationships we observe between physical quantities, nothing more and nothing less.

Haris045 said:
what is the multiplication doing to these physical quantities.
Multiplication is an abstract operation, it cannot "do" anything in the real world.

Haris045 said:
2)How does the multiplication relate back to the physical phenomena
It describes the relationship between them.

Haris045 said:
3)what does it show in an equation (about how it is combing the physical quantises to form a new on) , what does it mean in the equation , what is it doing to the physical quantises to form a new one?
Again these questions are not meaningful: multiplication is just multiplication. Similarly division is just division

Haris045 said:
4)so I can see that multiplication means 'applied over' but why does it mean this?
No it doesn't, it means multiplication. Examples where the words "applied over" don't fit:
  • Force = mass times acceleration ## (F = m a ) ##
  • Potential difference = current times resistance ## (V = IR) ##
  • Area = width times height

Also, division just means division. Examples where the concept of a rate "per" somthing doesn't fit:
  • Newtonian gravity ## \frac{GMm}{r^2} ##
  • Current = potential difference divided by resistance ## \left ( I = \frac V R \right ) ##
  • Frequency = wave speed divided by wavelength ## \left ( f = \frac v \lambda \right )##
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71, nasu, Ibix and 2 others
Haris045 said:
Summary: how and why can multiplication combine physical quantities to form a new physical quantity, to make an equation?

I am on a journey to not just understand how to manipulate physics equations but to understand why they work , and how they describe physical phenomena.

Many students struggle with compound units for the very reason you mention- units seem to obey rules of multiplication and division, but while 3/5 is readily understood to be a number, feet/year is clearly not a number. And it gets worse- for example, the units of magnetic field are [mass]/[time* coulomb], whatever that means.

I tell my students ( college & univ. Intro physics) that units are a principal difference between science and math. Unit analysis helps in problem-solving strategies (all forms of energy have units ML2/T2, for example).

Does that help?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PeroK
pbuk said:
Multiplication is an abstract operation, it cannot "do" anything in the real world.
Try saying that over in the Biology forum...
 
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: Vanadium 50 and kuruman
DaveC426913 said:
Try saying that over in the Biology forum...
Be fruitful and multiply?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: hutchphd and DaveC426913
Haris045 said:
Summary: how and why can multiplication combine physical quantities to form a new physical quantity, to make an equation?

I am on a journey to not just understand how to manipulate physics equations but to understand why they work , and how they describe physical phenomena.

I understand how division combines physical quantities.
[snip]

I understand what multiplication does numerically. But I don't understand how it can combine physical quantities to form a new one.
[snip]
I think one should not think of these operations as "forming new quantities."
Instead,
one should understand (for example)
  • the "work done by a constant force along a straight path" ##W## is a physical quantity
    that is proportional to the force along the path ##\vec F_x##
    and proportional to the displacement along the path ##\vec \Delta x##: thus, ##W=(F_x)(\Delta x)##.
  • Similarly, a "constant velocity"
    is proportional to the displacement traveled ##\Delta x##
    and inversely-proportional to the elapsed-time ##\Delta t##: thus, ##v=(\Delta x)\left(\frac{1}{\Delta t}\right)##.
(While one can perform the mathematical operation ##F_x (\Delta x)^3##,
it has no immediate physically-meaningful interpretation.)

Haris045 said:
4)so I can see that multiplication means 'applied over' but why does it mean this?

In some situations,
where the quantity is an integral (a sum of products where one factor may be varying),
one uses the colloquial description "applied over".
For example, if (in the example above) the work done is due to a variable force,
one is trying to describe the force (a dependent variable) as the position (an independent variable) varies.
But, as mentioned above by @pbuk, there are some situations where that is not the case.
(However, area could be described as a variable height along locations on the base.)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PeroK

Similar threads

  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
5K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
7K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K