How are Entropy and Temperature conjugate variables?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the relationship between temperature and entropy as conjugate variables in thermodynamics. Participants explore the conceptual underpinnings of this relationship, including definitions and implications for internal energy, heat flow, and work. The conversation includes technical explanations and personal interpretations of thermodynamic principles.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the definition of temperature as the average kinetic energy of particles, suggesting that this perspective complicates the understanding of its relationship with internal energy and entropy.
  • Another participant provides a formal definition of temperature in terms of entropy and internal energy, indicating that temperature and entropy are analogous to pressure and volume as conjugate variables.
  • A participant expresses confusion regarding how temperature relates to energy transfer through heat and work, suggesting that temperature might represent the potential for work based on kinetic energy.
  • Some participants emphasize the importance of using the proper thermodynamic definition of temperature, linking it to the flow of heat and the second law of thermodynamics, which states that entropy increases as systems approach equilibrium.
  • There is a correction regarding the definition of temperature, asserting that it is not defined solely by average kinetic energy but rather by its role in heat flow and entropy maximization.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants exhibit disagreement regarding the definition and conceptualization of temperature, with some advocating for a more traditional thermodynamic perspective while others challenge this view based on their interpretations of kinetic energy and work. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing views present.

Contextual Notes

Some limitations include differing interpretations of temperature, the dependence on thermodynamic definitions, and unresolved connections between temperature, internal energy, and entropy. The discussion does not reach a consensus on these points.

541099
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Can someone conceptually explain to me how Temperature and Entropy are conjugate variables?

I would imagine that Temperature and Internal Energy would be more appropriate, as I understand Heat flow causes changes in Internal Energy, some of which is used to change the translational motion of a particle, while the rest is used to increase the Entropy of the particle.
The portion that is increases translational motion is effective used to do Work, while the portion that increases Entropy represents a loss of Thermal Energy.

Do translational motion and entropy not constitute variables that fall under Internal Energy?
 
Science news on Phys.org
Temperature is defined as ##\frac{1}{T} = \frac{\partial S}{\partial U}##
This gives ##T = \frac{\partial U}{\partial S}##

Do you understand why pressure and volume are conjugate variables? Temperature and entropy appear analogous when the equation of state is written.
##dU = T dS + P dV##

The pressure tells you how hard (how much energy it takes) it is to change the volume. The temperature tells you how hard it is to change the entropy.
 
Khashishi, I guess what's confusing me is that Temperature is defined as the average kinetic energy of a particle in a system. This seems to necessitate the ability to do work.
If an increase in Temperature elicits an increase in Internal Energy, some would be manifest as an increase in Pressure by virtue of the inherent increase in translational motion (which would increase PV-Work), while some would inevitably be used to increase the Entropy (which is simply the non-translational components of molecular motion, from what I understand). Please correct me if I am misunderstanding anything.

I suppose my confusion is also compounded by my ignorance as to the relationship of Temperature to Energy transfer via Heat and Work. It seems to me that Temperature quite literally is a measure of the amount of Work a particle can do through its Kinetic Energy. Ironically, I've lost perspective of how Temperature is associated with Thermal Energy.
 
541099 said:
Khashishi, I guess what's confusing me is that Temperature is defined as the average kinetic energy of a particle in a system.
You are duely confused. Noone defines temperature this way.
Temperature defines the direction of the flow of heat. Heat flows always from the system with higher temperature to the one with lower temperature. For such a definition of temperature being possible you need the zeroth law of thermodynamics which states transitivity of heat flow.
 
If you want to do thermodynamics, you have to use the proper thermodynamics definition of temperature. I've already given you the definition above.

You might wonder, why is it defined this way? Well, consider two bodies that are at different temperatures that are placed in contact. In equilibrium, the temperatures are equal. Why does heat flow from the hotter body to the cooler body? An interpretation of the second law of thermodynamics is that the entropy increases as the system approaches equilibrium. If body A gains more entropy per unit heat (energy) than body B, then we call body B "hotter" than body A, because heat will flow from B to A to maximize the entropy. Therefore, temperature is a less fundamental concept than energy or entropy, and can be understood in those terms.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K