How are outer products quantum states?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the nature of quantum states, specifically the role of outer products and tensor products in quantum mechanics. Participants clarify that while quantum states can be represented as infinite dimensional vectors, expressions like ##|u\rangle \langle v|## are operators and not states unless ##u = v##. They emphasize that density matrices, which incorporate both quantum and classical uncertainty, are crucial for understanding entanglement and state representation. The conversation highlights the importance of distinguishing between different mathematical representations in quantum mechanics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics terminology, including "quantum states" and "density matrices."
  • Familiarity with linear algebra concepts, particularly vectors and operators.
  • Knowledge of entanglement and its mathematical implications in quantum systems.
  • Basic understanding of Hermitian operators and their properties in quantum mechanics.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties and applications of density matrices in quantum mechanics.
  • Learn about the spectral theorem and its relevance to diagonalizing operators.
  • Explore the concept of entanglement in greater depth, focusing on its mathematical representation.
  • Investigate the differences between vector representations and operator representations of quantum states.
USEFUL FOR

Quantum physicists, students of quantum mechanics, and researchers interested in the mathematical foundations of quantum states and entanglement.

Rodia
Messages
1
Reaction score
3
In my textbook, quantum states are infinite dimensional vectors. But I was watching a lecture on QM and the professor referred to ##|v> <u|## as itself being a quantum state. Also I saw online people saying the same thing.

Are tensor products just things that tell you whether or not the two particles that created it are entangled? So ##<p|q>## is not technically a state, but rather it is just a matrix which tells you that particle 1 is in state p and particle 2 is in state q? But then, if you have a situation where the two particles are entangled, then how do you ever measure them?

By the way if this is the wrong forum to post in, sorry, it's hard to tell. 'Irreducible tensor products' don't appear in my text until a lot later and I don't know some of the notation. I noticed that ##|v><u| w> = |v>a## for a scalar ##'a'##. Whereas ##<w| v><u|= b<u|##. So that's how you can tell if there's entanglement, but then what?

If I just don't have enough knowledge for this question let me know.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
An expression such as ##|u\rangle \langle v|## does not mean entanglement. It's an operator (or, you can think of it as an infinite square matrix).

There is a notion of "state" that uses such objects, and that is density matrices. A density matrix is an operator of the form: ##\sum_{\alpha \beta} \rho_{\alpha \beta} |\psi_\alpha\rangle \langle \psi_\beta|##, where ##|\psi_\alpha## is a complete set of orthonormal states. Sometimes people use "state" to mean the density matrix. You can think of it as a notion of "state" that incorporates both quantum mechanics and classical uncertainty.

But it doesn't have anything to do with entanglement. At least not directly.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: aaroman, Rodia and bhobba
## \langle p|q \rangle ## is a number. Also ## |v\rangle \langle u| ## cannot be a state (density matrix) unless ##u = v##. (A density matrix must be positive and therefore Hermitian.)

So let's say that you have ## |u\rangle \langle u| ## where ##|u\rangle## is normalized. What's the point of using this description? One point is that a vector ##e^{i\varphi}|u\rangle## for an arbitrary phase ##\varphi## physically describes the same state; the overall phase cannot be observed. Writing the outer product eliminates this unphysical phase: ## e^{i\varphi}|u\rangle \langle u|e^{-i\varphi} = |u\rangle \langle u| ## while retaining all other information that ##|u\rangle## has.

The other point is what @stevendaryl brought up: now you can "mix" quantum states, adding them in a way that cannot be done in the vector representation. ## |u\rangle \langle u| + |v\rangle \langle v| ## is very different from ## |u+v \rangle \langle u+v| ##! This new way of adding states represent two phenomena which turns out to be intimately related: classical uncertainty and entanglement. (Note that the formula for a density matrix in @stevendaryl's comment has off-diagonal terms, but it can always be diagonalized in some basis by the spectral theorem.)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Rodia and DrClaude
Late correction: I meant to write ## (|u\rangle + |v\rangle) (\langle u| + \langle v|) ##, not ## |u+v\rangle \langle u+v| ## in the last reply.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
7K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K