How Are Polar and Cartesian Graphs of \( r = e^{\theta} \) Related?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between the polar graph of \( r = e^{\theta} \) and the Cartesian representation of the same in the form of \( (\theta \cos{\theta}, \theta \sin{\theta}) \). Participants are exploring how these two representations might be connected and what implications arise from their intersection.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss defining the equations for both graphs and attempt to solve them simultaneously. There is an exploration of the implications of the equation \( e^{\theta} = \theta \) and its lack of real solutions. Some participants suggest plotting the graphs to visualize intersections and consider the implications of derivatives of the polar function.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants sharing insights and questioning the relationships between the functions. Some guidance has been offered regarding plotting the curves and considering numerical solutions, but there is no consensus on the overall relationship or implications yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants are grappling with the absence of real solutions to certain equations and the implications of this for understanding the relationship between the functions. The discussion includes considerations of derivatives and their relevance to the problem.

gordonj005
Messages
56
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



"Consider the graph of [itex]r = e^{\theta}[/itex] in polar coordinates. Then consider the graph of [itex](\theta \cos{\theta}, \theta \sin{\theta})[/itex] where [itex]\theta \in \mathbb{R}[/itex] on the Cartesian plane (x - y axis). How are the two graphs related? What relationship (if any) can we define between [itex]e^{\theta}[/itex] and the trigonometric functions?

The Attempt at a Solution



What I considered was [itex]r^2 = x^2 + y^2[/itex] where [itex]x = \theta \cos{\theta}[/itex] and y = [itex]\theta \sin{\theta}[/itex]. Plugging this all in I get:

[tex]e^{2\theta} = (\theta)^2 ((\cos{\theta})^2 + (\sin{\theta})^2)[/tex]

which reduces to:

[tex]e^{2 \theta} = (\theta)^2[/tex]

taking the ln of both sides, noting that [itex]\theta \ne 0[/itex]:

[tex]2 \theta = 2 ln \theta[/tex]

[tex]\theta = ln \theta[/tex]

So as it stands now, the above equation has no real solutions. So I thought maybe putting each side as a power of e would be the relation between the two graphs.

[tex]e^{\theta} = e^{ln \theta}[/tex]

[tex]e^{\theta} = {\theta}[/tex]

which is kind of a circluar argument because I just rearranged the equation. They mention this has something to do with trigonometric functions, I'm not seeing the connection. I would apprectiate some help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What you have done is define two equations, [tex]r^2 = \theta^2[/tex] and [tex]r = e^\theta[/tex]and then solve them simultaneously. The value of θ satisfying [tex]e^\theta = \theta[/tex]is simply where the two graphs intersect.
 
Yes, I realize this, but there are no real solutions to that equation. And also it doesn't tell me much about the relation between the two functions.
 
I have no idea about the rest of the problem, but I can tell you one thing. The curves do intersect. Just plot them. Show there is a solution to exp(t)=t+2*pi. You can find the root numerically if you want. Call it c. Now put c into the exponential and c+2*pi into the other curve. You'll get the same x,y coordinates. There are an infinite number of other similar solutions.
 
Last edited:
Oops, I omitted the negative sign! [tex]e^\theta = \theta[/tex] has no real roots, but [tex]e^\theta = -\theta[/tex] does!
 
Ah right you are, I thought that seemed weird that there were real intersection points but no solution. One thought i had was that if you take successive derivatives of [itex]r = e^{\theta}[/itex] you will get a tighter and tigher spiral. Eventually you should get the parametric function: [itex](\theta \cos{\theta}, \theta \sin{\theta})[/itex]. Any thoughts?
 
I've seen that before, its very nice. But does it have an application here?
 
gordonj005 said:
Ah right you are, I thought that seemed weird that there were real intersection points but no solution. One thought i had was that if you take successive derivatives of [itex]r = e^{\theta}[/itex] you will get a tighter and tigher spiral. Eventually you should get the parametric function: [itex](\theta \cos{\theta}, \theta \sin{\theta})[/itex]. Any thoughts?

Derivatives with respect to what? That doesn't sound right. I still don't quite get the point of this problem, I share that with you.
 
  • #10
Derivatives with respect to [itex]\theta[/itex]. I'm not sure, at this point I'm just grasping at answers. Any other thoughts?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K