How are the Maxwell's Electromagnetism equations traceless?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter swampwiz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electromagnetism
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the traceless nature of the stress-energy tensor in Maxwell's electrodynamics, exploring its implications and the underlying reasons for this property. Participants examine theoretical aspects, mathematical formulations, and potential anomalies related to quantum electrodynamics (QED).

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants note that the stress-energy tensor T is traceless, which is a characteristic of Maxwell’s electrodynamics.
  • One participant provides a mathematical expression for the trace of the energy-momentum tensor, suggesting that certain terms cancel out, leading to a traceless result.
  • Another participant mentions scale invariance of the free Maxwell equations as a reason for the traceless nature, while also indicating that this symmetry is fragile when quantizing the theory.
  • There is a claim that QED theory faces challenges due to the breaking of this symmetry during quantization, though this assertion is contested by others.
  • Some participants argue against the notion that little progress has been made in QED, questioning the validity of this claim.
  • Another participant raises the point that scale invariance is inherently broken with the introduction of massive particles, such as electrons and positrons in minimal QED.
  • There is a discussion about the usefulness of anomalies, with references to the trace anomaly in QCD and its implications for hadron mass.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the implications of scale invariance and the status of progress in QED. There is no consensus on the significance of the challenges posed by quantization or the characterization of progress in the field.

Contextual Notes

Some mathematical steps and assumptions regarding the traceless nature of the stress-energy tensor and the implications of scale invariance remain unresolved. The discussion includes references to specific theoretical constructs that may not be universally accepted.

swampwiz
Messages
567
Reaction score
83
I was reading this:

However, which only coincides with his final (correct) equation if the stress-energy tensor T (and hence also R) is traceless, i.e. that the sum of the elements on the main diagonal of the matrix trace are zero), which is true for Maxwell’s electrodynamics.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The trace of the energy-momentum tensor of the electromagnetic field is ##{T^i}_i = \dfrac{1}{4\pi} \left\{{F^i}_j{F_i}^j - \dfrac{1}{4} \eta^i_i F_{jk} F^{jk} \right\}##. Since ##\eta^i_i = \delta^i_i = 4## and also ##{F^i}_j{F_i}^j = \eta^{ik} \eta_{il} F_{kj} F^{lj} = F_{lj} F^{lj}##, the bit inside the curly brackets vanishes.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71
The reason is scale invariance of the free Maxwell equations. This symmetry is, however, very fragile since it's anomalously broken when quantizing the theory.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ergospherical and dextercioby
vanhees71 said:
The reason is scale invariance of the free Maxwell equations. This symmetry is, however, very fragile since it's anomalously broken when quantizing the theory.
So then it would seem that QED theory has a quandary; no wonder so little progress has been made.
 
  • Skeptical
Likes   Reactions: Motore and Dr Transport
What do you mean by "QED theory has a quandary"? I've no clue. The claim that "so little progress has been made" is just ridiculous particularly in the context of QED.
 
  • Love
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Vanadium 50 and Delta2
vanhees71 said:
What do you mean by "QED theory has a quandary"? I've no clue. The claim that "so little progress has been made" is just ridiculous particularly in the context of QED.
Because the symmetry is broken when quantizing?
 
What's the problem with scale invariance broken? It's broken anyway as soon as you have a single massive particle in the game (and the electrons and positrons in standard minimal QED are such particles).

Some anomalies are very helpful. E.g., the trace anomaly in QCD explains most of the mass of the hadrons consisting of light quarks (u, d, s) or the axial anomaly comes to the rescue for the neutral-pion decay.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
748
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
849
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K