I How are the Maxwell's Electromagnetism equations traceless?

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter swampwiz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electromagnetism
AI Thread Summary
Maxwell's equations exhibit tracelessness in the stress-energy tensor due to the scale invariance of free Maxwell equations, which leads to a zero trace condition. This property is significant for understanding the electromagnetic field's behavior, as it indicates that the sum of the diagonal elements of the tensor is zero. However, this symmetry is fragile and gets broken during the quantization process, raising questions about the implications for quantum electrodynamics (QED). Some participants argue that the claim of limited progress in QED is unfounded, emphasizing that anomalies can play a crucial role in explaining physical phenomena. The discussion highlights the complexities and challenges in reconciling classical and quantum theories in electromagnetism.
swampwiz
Messages
567
Reaction score
83
I was reading this:

However, which only coincides with his final (correct) equation if the stress-energy tensor T (and hence also R) is traceless, i.e. that the sum of the elements on the main diagonal of the matrix trace are zero), which is true for Maxwell’s electrodynamics.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The trace of the energy-momentum tensor of the electromagnetic field is ##{T^i}_i = \dfrac{1}{4\pi} \left\{{F^i}_j{F_i}^j - \dfrac{1}{4} \eta^i_i F_{jk} F^{jk} \right\}##. Since ##\eta^i_i = \delta^i_i = 4## and also ##{F^i}_j{F_i}^j = \eta^{ik} \eta_{il} F_{kj} F^{lj} = F_{lj} F^{lj}##, the bit inside the curly brackets vanishes.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71
The reason is scale invariance of the free Maxwell equations. This symmetry is, however, very fragile since it's anomalously broken when quantizing the theory.
 
  • Like
Likes ergospherical and dextercioby
vanhees71 said:
The reason is scale invariance of the free Maxwell equations. This symmetry is, however, very fragile since it's anomalously broken when quantizing the theory.
So then it would seem that QED theory has a quandary; no wonder so little progress has been made.
 
  • Skeptical
Likes Motore and Dr Transport
What do you mean by "QED theory has a quandary"? I've no clue. The claim that "so little progress has been made" is just ridiculous particularly in the context of QED.
 
  • Love
  • Like
Likes Vanadium 50 and Delta2
vanhees71 said:
What do you mean by "QED theory has a quandary"? I've no clue. The claim that "so little progress has been made" is just ridiculous particularly in the context of QED.
Because the symmetry is broken when quantizing?
 
What's the problem with scale invariance broken? It's broken anyway as soon as you have a single massive particle in the game (and the electrons and positrons in standard minimal QED are such particles).

Some anomalies are very helpful. E.g., the trace anomaly in QCD explains most of the mass of the hadrons consisting of light quarks (u, d, s) or the axial anomaly comes to the rescue for the neutral-pion decay.
 
Back
Top