How are the Maxwell's Electromagnetism equations traceless?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter swampwiz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electromagnetism
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the traceless nature of the stress-energy tensor in Maxwell's electrodynamics, specifically how it relates to the electromagnetic field. The trace of the energy-momentum tensor is established as zero due to scale invariance in the free Maxwell equations, which is a critical aspect of the theory. However, this symmetry is fragile and is broken during the quantization process, leading to complexities in Quantum Electrodynamics (QED). The conversation highlights the ongoing challenges and misconceptions regarding advancements in QED theory.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Maxwell's equations and their implications in electrodynamics
  • Familiarity with the concept of the stress-energy tensor in field theory
  • Knowledge of scale invariance and its role in theoretical physics
  • Basic principles of Quantum Electrodynamics (QED)
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and implications of the stress-energy tensor in electromagnetic theory
  • Explore the concept of scale invariance in quantum field theories
  • Investigate the trace anomaly in Quantum Chromodynamics (QCD) and its significance
  • Examine the effects of quantization on symmetries in Quantum Electrodynamics (QED)
USEFUL FOR

The discussion is beneficial for theoretical physicists, students of quantum field theory, and researchers interested in the intricacies of electromagnetic theory and its quantization challenges.

swampwiz
Messages
567
Reaction score
83
I was reading this:

However, which only coincides with his final (correct) equation if the stress-energy tensor T (and hence also R) is traceless, i.e. that the sum of the elements on the main diagonal of the matrix trace are zero), which is true for Maxwell’s electrodynamics.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The trace of the energy-momentum tensor of the electromagnetic field is ##{T^i}_i = \dfrac{1}{4\pi} \left\{{F^i}_j{F_i}^j - \dfrac{1}{4} \eta^i_i F_{jk} F^{jk} \right\}##. Since ##\eta^i_i = \delta^i_i = 4## and also ##{F^i}_j{F_i}^j = \eta^{ik} \eta_{il} F_{kj} F^{lj} = F_{lj} F^{lj}##, the bit inside the curly brackets vanishes.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71
The reason is scale invariance of the free Maxwell equations. This symmetry is, however, very fragile since it's anomalously broken when quantizing the theory.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ergospherical and dextercioby
vanhees71 said:
The reason is scale invariance of the free Maxwell equations. This symmetry is, however, very fragile since it's anomalously broken when quantizing the theory.
So then it would seem that QED theory has a quandary; no wonder so little progress has been made.
 
  • Skeptical
Likes   Reactions: Motore and Dr Transport
What do you mean by "QED theory has a quandary"? I've no clue. The claim that "so little progress has been made" is just ridiculous particularly in the context of QED.
 
  • Love
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Vanadium 50 and Delta2
vanhees71 said:
What do you mean by "QED theory has a quandary"? I've no clue. The claim that "so little progress has been made" is just ridiculous particularly in the context of QED.
Because the symmetry is broken when quantizing?
 
What's the problem with scale invariance broken? It's broken anyway as soon as you have a single massive particle in the game (and the electrons and positrons in standard minimal QED are such particles).

Some anomalies are very helpful. E.g., the trace anomaly in QCD explains most of the mass of the hadrons consisting of light quarks (u, d, s) or the axial anomaly comes to the rescue for the neutral-pion decay.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
585
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
34
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K