How can c be shown to bisect the angle between a and b?

  • Thread starter Thread starter TheMadCapBeta
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proof Vector
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on proving that vector c, defined as c = |a|b + |b|a, bisects the angle between nonzero vectors a and b. Participants emphasize the importance of not assuming the angles are equal in the proof process. They suggest using the parallelogram method for vector addition and the properties of unit vectors to demonstrate that c bisects the angle by forming an isosceles triangle. The conversation highlights the need for a rigorous approach to vector analysis and the application of dot products to establish angle relationships.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector notation and operations
  • Familiarity with the dot product and its geometric interpretation
  • Knowledge of the parallelogram law in vector addition
  • Concept of unit vectors and their properties
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of the dot product in vector geometry
  • Learn about the parallelogram law and its applications in vector addition
  • Explore proofs involving bisectors in vector spaces
  • Investigate the relationship between unit vectors and angle bisectors
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, physics, and engineering who are working with vector analysis and geometric proofs, particularly those interested in understanding vector relationships and angle bisectors.

TheMadCapBeta
Hello everyone.

I have to solve this proof, and I'm having a little trouble. Let me explain.

<Let bold lower case letter represent a vector, and |a| represent the length of vector.>

If c = |a|b + |b|a, where a, b, and c are all nonzero vectors, show that c bisects the angle between a and b.

I'm trying to prove this by Corollay, since both angles will be equal (and half of the whole between a and b.

So:

cos(x) = (b · c) / |b||c|

cos(x) = (a · c) / |a||c|


[(b · c)/|b||c| ] = [ (a · c) / |a||c| ]

[(b · (|a|b + |b|a))/|b||c| ] = [(a · (|a|b + |b|a))/|a||c| ]

Then distributing the numerator on each side and by dot product

b · b = |b|^2 and a · b = |a||b|cos(x)

So:


[(|a||b|^2 + |b||a||b|cos(x))/|b||c| ] =

[(|a||a||b|cos(x) + |b||a|^2)/|a||c| ]


And this is basically as far as I got. I saw some oppurtunites to factor out some components but it didn't really come to much.

Any help would be greatly appreciated since I have to hand it in by wednesday.

Thanks again.


-Doug
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, your main problem is that just about the very first thing you did was to assume what you're trying to prove! You can't use the fact that the two angles are equal because you're trying to prove it.
 
What do you suggest?
 
dude,

divide by the magnitudes,

c/(|a||b|)=a(unit vector)+ b(unit vector)

now there's the parallelogram method for adding vectors, where a and b form two sides of a parallelogram, and since they are UNIT vectors, the parallelogram will have equal sides. Therefor, each half of the rhombus is an isosceles triangle. c will be cut across the diagonal of this rhombus.
 
Last edited:
Your idea of computing angles with dot products is good; but you need to use that to prove the angles are the same.
 
Originally posted by theunknot
dude,

divide by the magnitudes,

c/(|a||b|)=a(unit vector)+ b(unit vector)

now there's the parallelogram method for adding vectors, where a and b form two sides of a parallelogram, and since they are UNIT vectors, the parallelogram will have equal sides. Therefor, each half of the rhombus is an isosceles triangle. c will be cut across the diagonal of this rhombus.

c= |a||b|( a/|a| + b/|b|)

c/|a||b| = a/|a| + b/|b|

Here's what I got out of your reply. c/|a||b| will be the resultant vector of the two unit vectors on the right side. And yes, since they are UNIT vectors , the parallelogram will be an equilateral quadtrilateral. The c vector will be the hypotenuse, bisecting the angle...

theunknot. Good job pointing this out, I really didn't see it.
But yes, Hurkyl is right. The angle must be proven symmetrical.

I'm going to try and work this out more. Any more advice would be welcome. Thanks
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Relativistic Momentum, Mass, and Energy Momentum and mass (...), the classic equations for conserving momentum and energy are not adequate for the analysis of high-speed collisions. (...) The momentum of a particle moving with velocity ##v## is given by $$p=\cfrac{mv}{\sqrt{1-(v^2/c^2)}}\qquad{R-10}$$ ENERGY In relativistic mechanics, as in classic mechanics, the net force on a particle is equal to the time rate of change of the momentum of the particle. Considering one-dimensional...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 70 ·
3
Replies
70
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K