How Can De Moivre's Formula Help Find the Real Part of z=ii?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on finding the real part of the complex number z=ii using De Moivre's formula. Participants clarify that rewriting z in exponential form as z = e^(i ln(i)) leads to the conclusion that ln(i) = iπ/2. The final result is derived as i^i = e^(-π/2), confirming that the real part is indeed a real number. This approach simplifies the problem significantly and is validated by tools like Wolfram Alpha.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of complex numbers and their representation in exponential form
  • Familiarity with De Moivre's theorem and its applications
  • Knowledge of logarithms, particularly the natural logarithm of complex numbers
  • Basic proficiency in using mathematical tools like Wolfram Alpha for verification
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and applications of De Moivre's theorem in complex analysis
  • Learn about the properties of logarithms in the context of complex numbers
  • Explore the implications of Euler's formula in solving complex equations
  • Practice using Wolfram Alpha for complex number calculations and verifications
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in mathematics, particularly those studying complex analysis, as well as anyone interested in understanding the applications of De Moivre's formula in solving complex equations.

zenite
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
1. Find the real part of z=ii by using De Moivre's formula.



Homework Equations


z= r(cos\theta + i sin\theta)
zn= rn(cos(n\theta) + i sin(n\theta))


I tried using n=i to solve and got the ans 1i, but somehow feel that its not that simple. And the resultant argument I got from this approach is i\theta which doesn't make sense. Tried using natural log, but didn't work out too.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Start by rewriting in exponential form and then use:

(eix)n = einx

That should do the trick :wink:
 
z = ii = ei(lni)
so n=lni and the real part is cos(lni). is this correct?
 
I'm not sure where your ln(i) comes from but that part is correct since ln(i) = i\pi/2. However it can be simplified further.

I would have just written:
i^{i} = (e^{i\pi/2})^{i} = e^{i i\pi/2} = e^{- \pi/2} and that's your answer since this is a real number already. (Wolfram Alpha confirms it)
 
thanks a lot. I couldn't get the part where lni = i(PI)/2, tried googling but couldn't find anything. but I could understand your working, you make it look so simple.

I used the formula, elny = y for my working, that's where the ln comes from. but yours is much more simplified.
 
zenite said:
I couldn't get the part where lni = i(PI)/2

Well, actually I just used Wolfram Alpha to find that, but if we combine our formulas, we have just proved it's true.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K