How can doppler effect occur when c is indepedent of motion?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the Doppler effect in relation to the constancy of the speed of light, particularly in the context of astronomical observations. Participants explore the implications of light's speed being constant regardless of the motion of the observer or source, and how this relates to observed shifts in frequency and wavelength (blue and red shifts) of light from moving sources.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express confusion about how the Doppler effect can occur if the speed of light is constant and independent of motion.
  • One participant clarifies that the speed of light in a vacuum is constant and discusses how the speed of light can appear to change in different media due to absorption and re-emission processes.
  • Another participant emphasizes that the Doppler effect relates to changes in frequency and wavelength rather than the speed of light itself, assuming the light travels through a vacuum or non-dispersive medium.
  • Visual aids, such as animations, are mentioned to illustrate how wave emissions from a moving light source result in varying spacings of waves, leading to blue and red shifts for different observers.
  • One participant acknowledges the clarification provided by animations regarding frequency changes and notes the differences in the Doppler effect for sound.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally express confusion and seek clarification on the relationship between the constancy of light speed and the Doppler effect. Multiple competing views and interpretations remain, particularly regarding the implications of light's speed in different contexts.

Contextual Notes

Some limitations include the need for clearer definitions of terms like "medium" and "constant speed," as well as the assumptions underlying the discussion of light's behavior in various frames of reference.

k!rl
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
I thought the speed of light was constant independent of the motions of the observer and light source. So I don't understand how the doppler (blue-red) shift can be observed on incomming or receding astronomical light sources?

Speed also varies depending on the medium it travels through, so what is meant when they say the speed of light is constant?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
k!rl said:
I thought the speed of light was constant independent of the motions of the observer and light source. So I don't understand how the doppler (blue-red) shift can be observed on incomming or receding astronomical light sources?

Speed also varies depending on the medium it travels through, so what is meant when they say the speed of light is constant?
I have often wondered about your first question, myself. I have got what I considered good answers in the past but can no longer remember! I'm sure someone else will answer it here.

I can answer your second question- the proper statement is that the speed of light in vacuum is constant. We can also argue that the speed of light between atoms is constant, it is the time taken when light is absorbed and then retransmitted that reduces the observed speed of light through a different medium. The remarkable thing about light is that its speed is constant to an observer in any frame of reference. Classical theory says that the speed of light seen by an observer moving toward the light source at, say, 10000 mph, would be 20000 that seen by an observer moving away from the light source at 10000 mph. Relativity says that the two observers will see that same speed of light.
 
k!rl said:
I thought the speed of light was constant independent of the motions of the observer and light source. So I don't understand how the doppler (blue-red) shift can be observed on incomming or receding astronomical light sources?

The Doppler effect has to do with the frequency/wavelength of observed light, not its speed. The two are independent, at least as long as we assume the light is moving through vacuum (or some non-dispersive medium).
 
k!rl said:
I thought the speed of light was constant independent of the motions of the observer and light source. So I don't understand how the doppler (blue-red) shift can be observed on incomming or receding astronomical light sources?

Speed also varies depending on the medium it travels through, so what is meant when they say the speed of light is constant?

Consider the following animations. The first shows a light source not moving with respect to two observers. The light waves radiate out at a constant speed in all directions.

doppler1.gif


Now what happens when the light source moves with respect to the observers.

doppler2.gif


Note how each wave still radiates out at a constant speed after it leaves the source. But each successive wave is emitted when the source is closer to the blue observer and further from the red one than it was for the previous wave emission. Thus the spacing between the waves is closer for the blue observer than it is for the red observer and you get blue and red shift.
 
Thanks for the answers!

I was going to ask why the frequency would change but the animation answered that very well, so thanks for posting those Janus. It's interesting the doppler effect happens with sound for entirely different reasons.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 60 ·
3
Replies
60
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K