How can Fubini's Theorem be applied to solve more complex integrals?

  • Thread starter Thread starter johnny.wi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Stochastic
johnny.wi
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I am really stuck on this and can't find any information or examples on it. My textbook has one example in it and it isn't explained at all. It is the following?

∫B{s}ds

integrated From 0 to t.It is then changed to a double integral and fubinis theorm is applied to arrive at the solution by changing the limits of integration and odrer of integration, with no explanation as to the method.


This is easy to solve with integration by parts, but i am trying to figure out how to use fubinis theorm and how to change the limits of integration so i can apply the method to some more elaborate integrals.
I already now the anser and that it is normally distributed, i am inerested in the application of fubinis theorm and not integration by parts.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
johnny.wi said:
I am really stuck on this and can't find any information or examples on it. My textbook has one example in it and it isn't explained at all. It is the following?

∫B{s}ds

integrated From 0 to t.It is then changed to a double integral and fubinis theorm is applied to arrive at the solution by changing the limits of integration and odrer of integration, with no explanation as to the method.


This is easy to solve with integration by parts, but i am trying to figure out how to use fubinis theorm and how to change the limits of integration so i can apply the method to some more elaborate integrals.
I already now the anser and that it is normally distributed, i am inerested in the application of fubinis theorm and not integration by parts.

Perhaps this might help:

http://math.stackexchange.com/questions/83239/application-of-fubinis-theorem
 
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Thread 'Detail of Diagonalization Lemma'
The following is more or less taken from page 6 of C. Smorynski's "Self-Reference and Modal Logic". (Springer, 1985) (I couldn't get raised brackets to indicate codification (Gödel numbering), so I use a box. The overline is assigning a name. The detail I would like clarification on is in the second step in the last line, where we have an m-overlined, and we substitute the expression for m. Are we saying that the name of a coded term is the same as the coded term? Thanks in advance.
Back
Top