Admissions How can I be sure I'm applying to a school I can get into?

[Delong]

I'm applying to graduate schools for biochemistry, biophysics, or microbiology. Last time I applied to seven schools and got rejected from all of them. I don't know for sure why I was rejected but I think it's partly because I applied to to many big name schools where they receive a lot of applicants. How can I make sure I'm applying to schools that are in my league and what can I do on my personal statement to help me get in? Thanks.

 

[Dr. Courtney]

I'm applying to graduate schools for biochemistry, biophysics, or microbiology. Last time I applied to seven schools and got rejected from all of them. I don't know for sure why I was rejected but I think it's partly because I applied to to many big name schools where they receive a lot of applicants. How can I make sure I'm applying to schools that are in my league and what can I do on my personal statement to help me get in? Thanks.

It is best to ask this question of advisors who are familiar with your academic record, research accomplishments, as well as the schools to which you aspire. Physicists in the US can give vague info about GRE scores and GPAs that are likely to be viewed favorably by top 10, top 50, top 100 physics depts, etc, but you really want advice from someone who knows your record and ambitions.

 

[Delong]

It is best to ask this question of advisors who are familiar with your academic record, research accomplishments, as well as the schools to which you aspire. Physicists in the US can give vague info about GRE scores and GPAs that are likely to be viewed favorably by top 10, top 50, top 100 physics depts, etc, but you really want advice from someone who knows your record and ambitions.

Ok I'll see if I can do that but I haven't talked with my professors for a while but I'll see what I can do.

 

[Choppy]

I agree with Dr. Courtney.

Of the seven schools you applied to, how many did you visit? What kind of contact did you make with the people there? Did you talk with any potential advisors? Did you talk with any current graduate students? This is how you get key information, such as which professors are actively looking for students, how many spots they will have open, and what kind of GPA will make you competitive. What some students miss is that sometimes even though a particular subfield is studied at a particular school, there's not necessarily any guarantee that professors in that area have the capacity to take on new students that year.

The other thing is that having a professor in your corner who wants to take you on goes a long way. If you're just an application, it's hard to get people to advocate for you. But if you have a professor who sends an email to the admission committee saying - this student has talked with me, seems keen on one of my projects and I would be willing to take him or her on, that will go a LONG way towards getting you a spot.

Another thought that comes to mind is that biophysics and microbiology are quite different fields. Biophysics tends to be a branch of physics and as such, usually requires a degree in physics to study at the graduate level. Do you have a double major in physics and biochemistry? If not, I can't help but wonder if you ran into an issue of simply not being qualified for the program you applied to.

 

[Delong]

I agree with Dr. Courtney.

Of the seven schools you applied to, how many did you visit? What kind of contact did you make with the people there? Did you talk with any potential advisors? Did you talk with any current graduate students? This is how you get key information, such as which professors are actively looking for students, how many spots they will have open, and what kind of GPA will make you competitive. What some students miss is that sometimes even though a particular subfield is studied at a particular school, there's not necessarily any guarantee that professors in that area have the capacity to take on new students that year.

The other thing is that having a professor in your corner who wants to take you on goes a long way. If you're just an application, it's hard to get people to advocate for you. But if you have a professor who sends an email to the admission committee saying - this student has talked with me, seems keen on one of my projects and I would be willing to take him or her on, that will go a LONG way towards getting you a spot.

Another thought that comes to mind is that biophysics and microbiology are quite different fields. Biophysics tends to be a branch of physics and as such, usually requires a degree in physics to study at the graduate level. Do you have a double major in physics and biochemistry? If not, I can't help but wonder if you ran into an issue of simply not being qualified for the program you applied to.

I don't have a physics major although I honestly wish I did, if I were to go back a second time I would try to have double majored in physics and biochemistry. Needless to say I took a lot of extra electives in physics and I'm interested in one specific area of biophysics. Specifically I'm interested in the biophysics of light absorption in photosynthesis. I took quantum mechanics and quantum chemistry hopefully that is enough to help me get in.

So should I make up my mind between biophysics and microbiology?

 

[Dishsoap]

Wait... so what degree do you have?

 

[Delong]

Wait... so what degree do you have?

I majored in biochemistry. I took a lot of electives in math physics and chemistry

 

[Choppy]

So should I make up my mind between biophysics and microbiology?

Well, you'll have to at some point.

But the main issue is that even if you have taken courses in physics and math, if the biophysics programs you're applying to are run through a physics department, then you're going to face a fairly big roadblock without that physics degree. People on the admissions committee will want to know that there's a good chance you'll pass your qualifying exam and candidacy exam well before your thesis defence - and if there are portions of an undergraduate physics education missing (such as senior E&M, thermodynamics, senior mechanics, etc) then they'll pass on your application. And if you've applied to particularly competitive programs, even if you get through that threshold, you're still competing against other students who have more directly relevant coursework.

Either way, the strategy is to figure out where your strengths are - or at least where they are perceived to be by anyone assessing your evaluation. A good way to do this is to talk with those people acting as your referees and try to get an idea of how they see you.

 

[Vanadium 50]

I haven't talked with my professors for a while

That's not helping. You should talk to them.

 

[Dishsoap]

I majored in biochemistry. I took a lot of electives in math physics and chemistry

So why would a university take you as opposed to someone with a degree in physics?

 

[Delong]

So why would a university take you as opposed to someone with a degree in physics?

Because I'm interested in biophysics and I feel like it's very similar to biochemistry...

 

[Vanadium 50]

I think you missed half of dishsoap's question - why should they tell someone who has a degree in physics that they can't attend in order to admit you?

 

[Delong]

I think you missed half of dishsoap's question - why should they tell someone who has a degree in physics that they can't attend in order to admit you?

I don't know I didn't think that all the way through. All I know is that I find biophysics interesting and I took a lot of physics electives. And I have a good relationship with my physics professor. And that's mostly all I have to offer.

 

[micromass]

What physics courses did you take?
What research experience in physics do you have?

 

[Delong]

What physics courses did you take?
What research experience in physics do you have?

I took general phys, classical mechanics, special relativity, quantum mechanics 1 and 2, quantum chemistry, thermodynamics (chemistry version...)

And a bunch of math classes like diff eq, vector calc, and probability...

I don't have any research experience in pure physics but I do have research experience on the light absorption process of photosynthesis...

 

[micromass]

I took general phys, classical mechanics, special relativity, quantum mechanics 1 and 2, quantum chemistry, thermodynamics (chemistry version...)

And a bunch of math classes like diff eq, vector calc, and probability...

So no E&M. That will severely hurt your application.

 

[Delong]

So no E&M. That will severely hurt your application.

So I see. Maybe I should give up on trying to get into biophysics and apply to programs in biochemistry or microbiology instead. I took more classes in biology and chemistry than math and physics anyway and I can still contribute to photosynthesis research...

 

[Dishsoap]

So I see. Maybe I should give up on trying to get into biophysics and apply to programs in biochemistry or microbiology instead. I took more classes in biology and chemistry than math and physics anyway and I can still contribute to photosynthesis research...

I'm going to have to agree here. I have done a small amount of biophysics research and it is nothing like biochemistry.

 

[Delong]

I'm going to have to agree here. I have done a small amount of biophysics research and it is nothing like biochemistry.

Ok thanks for your advice I think that will make things a little easier now I know not to try biophysics...

 

[Mike H]

Delong - were you applying to physics PhD programs or the various (interdisciplinary )biophysics/biochemistry PhD programs/departments? It's still not clear to me, as in principle, an undergraduate degree in biochemistry with additional math/physics/chemistry electives should be a pretty reasonable fit for the latter type of graduate programs. If you were applying to physics programs, then the other comments in this thread have already taken care of that issue.

You mention that you are particularly fascinated by photosynthetic light harvesting due to previous research experience. I presume that all of the programs you applied to have people studying that - if not, you will need to figure out who's doing this type of work that interests you.

 

[Delong]

Delong - were you applying to physics PhD programs or the various (interdisciplinary )biophysics/biochemistry PhD programs/departments? It's still not clear to me, as in principle, an undergraduate degree in biochemistry with additional math/physics/chemistry electives should be a pretty reasonable fit for the latter type of graduate programs. If you were applying to physics programs, then the other comments in this thread have already taken care of that issue.

You mention that you are particularly fascinated by photosynthetic light harvesting due to previous research experience. I presume that all of the programs you applied to have people studying that - if not, you will need to figure out who's doing this type of work that interests you.

Thanks for your response. I'm applying to biophysics programs not pure physics programs. I do confess I am interested in artificial photosynthesis research but I checked some of the programs and I think their work is a little bit beyond me. Sticking to biophysics or even just biochemistry is probably a lot more manageable for me.

 

[gleem]

So far this thread has only discussed suitability of your academic background for your graduate aspirations. One thing that jumped out at me is your lack of focus on what you want to do biophysics, biochemistry or microbiology obviously not much overlap. How did you present your goals to the schools you applied to.? You present yourself in this thread as indecisive which a graduate program will pick up as a negative feature. Another missing bit of info is what GRE did you submit to these programs.and what was your GPA in the biochemistry physics, and math?

 

[Dishsoap]

Keep in mind that most graduate programs in biophysics will require you to take grad-level physics courses. That means grad-level E&M, stat mech, quantum, and classical mechanics. Going into grad-level E&M without taking it in undergrad means you will fail. And not a little bit.

 

[Mike H]

Thanks for your response. I'm applying to biophysics programs not pure physics programs. I do confess I am interested in artificial photosynthesis research but I checked some of the programs and I think their work is a little bit beyond me. Sticking to biophysics or even just biochemistry is probably a lot more manageable for me.

Alright then. My unspoken concern was that you had uniformly mentioned "I want to do X type of research" in a personal statement and then applied to schools, not checking whether or not they had faculty doing research in that area. However, the point above about you seeming indecisive has some validity, although not because you applied to biochemistry, biophysics, and microbiology programs. All of those could be fine choices if you had, say, interests in the structure and function of membrane proteins, and found schools where those graduate programs had particular strengths. (Going off the notion that photosynthesis is mediated by membrane protein complexes, that is, and you thought membrane proteins were really cool as a result.) You have to ask yourself, "What are my somewhat specific scientific interests?" and work from there. You need to start moving from "I'm interested in biochemistry, biophysics, and microbiology" to "I'm interested in membrane proteins, energy transfer mechanisms, and bioinorganic complexes." Or whatever it is that interests you. This is something you should have done already if you're applying to graduate school, to be honest, IMO.

Keep in mind that most graduate programs in biophysics will require you to take grad-level physics courses. That means grad-level E&M, stat mech, quantum, and classical mechanics. Going into grad-level E&M without taking it in undergrad means you will fail. And not a little bit.

I'm not sure if this is believable, at least in the US. I applied to a couple of US biophysics graduate programs way back in the day (from the interdisciplinary graduate program to joint biophysics/biochemistry departments) - and looked at many, many more - and their curricular requirements looked nothing like this. Is this elsewhere, then? Unless you're talking about physics PhD programs which might offer some sort of biophysics concentration, in which case, that's really not the situation the OP has found himself in, I'm deducing.

 

[Almeisan]

Depends on who is doing the biophysics. Often it is biologists and chemists doing biophysics. A real physicist wouldn't call that physics. It's the problem with interdisciplinary research. You may have all that advanced E&M and other physics subjects with even less relevance, and you will be doing lots of molecular biology or biochem before you get to do a physics measurement on a physics property.

Pretty sure there's also pure physics labs that research the physics that occur in biological systems. Very different from working on a physical question in a microbe or plant that is your subject of research, which generally are done in mol.biology/biochem type of labs.The 'right' types of biophysics, biochemistry and microbiology are indistinguishable.

 

[Mike H]

Depends on who is doing the biophysics. Often it is biologists and chemists doing biophysics. A real physicist wouldn't call that physics. It's the problem with interdisciplinary research. You may have all that advanced E&M and other physics subjects with even less relevance, and you will be doing lots of molecular biology or biochem before you get to do a physics measurement on a physics property.

Yeah, this is the sort of semantic hairsplitting I try to avoid. ;) My point remains, though - yes, sure, physics PhD programs will require the coursework you mention. Perhaps there are some biophysics programs where it might be required (I don't know of any - do you have any that do in mind?) but my impression is that it would hardly be the majority, at least here in the US. My experience with biophysics PhD programs that are either a graduate degree program or housed in a formal academic department is that they tend to be somewhat flexible on admissions requirements, and don't require the same coursework that a typical physics PhD program has in place.

 

[Dishsoap]

Strange, I know that at least the biophysics program here (CU-Boulder) is in the physics department and requires the same courses (minus some class, plus some biology class)

 

[Almeisan]

You mean following graduate courses in physics.

Well, to me a PhD is a job where you show you can function in an academic setting and publish original research. Either with the one background or the other, when you arrive at the lab you will need to learn some new lab techniques or data processing/modelling.

You can't do an MSc in physics with just chemistry or biology, and including the basic physics in that if any, as your background to do a graduate programme in physics.

But you say that you are from the US. You probably know that the US does stuff differently than most of the rest of the world. Usually the coursework involved in a PhD is teaching coursework.

Any interdisciplinary research group has to recruit people with different backgrounds and they sure have some experience with how to make the chemist or mol.biologist they really need, fit in.
And it is not like every physicist knows the details about gene expression, protein folding or has actually imaged cells using lasers or AFM.

This actually makes me wonder how interdisciplinary groups in the US manage. If you are working in biophysics but your degree is biology and the coursework you require is advanced mol.bio courses and specialized biophysics lab courses, how does that work out? Seems this may lead to only certain undergrad degrees being accepted in a research group, because of the attached coursework. A research group, like a business, needs people with different backgrounds.

 

[Delong]

So far this thread has only discussed suitability of your academic background for your graduate aspirations. One thing that jumped out at me is your lack of focus on what you want to do biophysics, biochemistry or microbiology obviously not much overlap. How did you present your goals to the schools you applied to.? You present yourself in this thread as indecisive which a graduate program will pick up as a negative feature. Another missing bit of info is what GRE did you submit to these programs.and what was your GPA in the biochemistry physics, and math?

Well I only say biophysics, biochemistry, and microbiology as the general programs I'm applying to although I would be looking for a certain projects more specifically. I guess one mistake I did is that I wrote about how I like all of science when I should have been specific on one interest...You're right I need to present myself as more decisive.

The problem is I know that I'm interested in photosynthesis but I have trouble getting more specific than that. I'm interested in all aspects of the process and I don't know what to apply for specifically.

As for my GRE scores I believe they are pretty good and I am not worried about them. My GPA is best in my chemistry, math, and biology classes, but relatively poor in my biochemistry and physics classes...

 

[Delong]

Alright then. My unspoken concern was that you had uniformly mentioned "I want to do X type of research" in a personal statement and then applied to schools, not checking whether or not they had faculty doing research in that area. However, the point above about you seeming indecisive has some validity, although not because you applied to biochemistry, biophysics, and microbiology programs. All of those could be fine choices if you had, say, interests in the structure and function of membrane proteins, and found schools where those graduate programs had particular strengths. (Going off the notion that photosynthesis is mediated by membrane protein complexes, that is, and you thought membrane proteins were really cool as a result.) You have to ask yourself, "What are my somewhat specific scientific interests?" and work from there. You need to start moving from "I'm interested in biochemistry, biophysics, and microbiology" to "I'm interested in membrane proteins, energy transfer mechanisms, and bioinorganic complexes." Or whatever it is that interests you. This is something you should have done already if you're applying to graduate school, to be honest, IMO.

Every school I applied to I made sure they had some professors working on projects I'm interested in. I'm interested in photosynthesis and if I had to pick one aspect of that that I'd like to focus in on it would be the physics of the energy transfer process when light is absorbed into chlorophyll...however I'm also just broadly interested in everything the chloroplast does...

 

[Mike H]

Strange, I know that at least the biophysics program here (CU-Boulder) is in the physics department and requires the same courses (minus some class, plus some biology class)

Quick Google searching yielded this program, where it would seem that the requirements for a molecular biophysics certificate could in principle be satisfied with successful graduate studies in multiple departments. This is a rather clever way of doing it, and kind of stands apart from the interdisciplinary programs I was referring to earlier. Now, if this isn't the program you're thinking of, no idea what the deal is then.

Every school I applied to I made sure they had some professors working on projects I'm interested in. I'm interested in photosynthesis and if I had to pick one aspect of that that I'd like to focus in on it would be the physics of the energy transfer process when light is absorbed into chlorophyll...however I'm also just broadly interested in everything the chloroplast does...

Again, as mentioned earlier in this thread, you're going to want to speak to one of your previous professors (ideally, your former research supervisor), especially for advice here. If you appropriately tailored your personal statement/research interests to each school, being sure to tie what they have going on with your past experience/education, that's a reasonable measure. You want to make sure that you have some understanding of what research is being done there, and some expression of interest in that based on your previous experiences. I worked on photosynthesis as well as an undergraduate, and found it fascinating, but I wasn't quite so fixated on continuing with it - it may have been easier since I developed the sorts of 'somewhat specific' interests in membrane proteins, optical & magnetic spectroscopies, and bioinorganic systems, which are a bit more transferable (you can find these sorts of areas under investigations in plenty of places, while photosynthesis itself is a bit harder to find).

This actually makes me wonder how interdisciplinary groups in the US manage. If you are working in biophysics but your degree is biology and the coursework you require is advanced mol.bio courses and specialized biophysics lab courses, how does that work out? Seems this may lead to only certain undergrad degrees being accepted in a research group, because of the attached coursework. A research group, like a business, needs people with different backgrounds.

Generally, they start to contribute - as possible - in areas where they're strong, and start to catch up in areas where they're weak. It's not uncommon for interdisciplinary groups to have tutorials in particular areas from within the group, where the group experts take the lead to help others catch up - there's often not enough demand for formal classwork for everything that needs to be passed along to be instituted, so this is what results. We did this in the last academic lab I worked, in fact. In the end, graduate school is about becoming a self-directed learner - you find something you need to learn about, and you do it. You don't wander around wondering why there wasn't a class about it. You ask people who might already be familiar for help as necessary, and perhaps have to brush up on adjunct topics that wind up being essential. And so on.

 

[Almeisan]

The issue is with an American style grad school, where you follow two years of advanced bachelor courses and master courses, skip your thesis, and work on your PhD right away.

You have to do a certain amount of grad school courses. If it is mandatory to do physics coursework as a biophysics grad student, how do they get PhD candidates of different backgrounds? They will have to get biologists as postdocs and they have to teach the physics PhD candicates everything about biology.

My school doesn't even have a physics MSc, but we do have a biophysics group. If we had the US system they couldn't hire PhD candidates with physics backgrounds because there is no real physics coursework being offered here. At least nothing that requires the rigerous undergrad program a phyics BSc offers.

 

[Delong]

You mean following graduate courses in physics.

Well, to me a PhD is a job where you show you can function in an academic setting and publish original research. Either with the one background or the other, when you arrive at the lab you will need to learn some new lab techniques or data processing/modelling.

You can't do an MSc in physics with just chemistry or biology, and including the basic physics in that if any, as your background to do a graduate programme in physics.

But you say that you are from the US. You probably know that the US does stuff differently than most of the rest of the world. Usually the coursework involved in a PhD is teaching coursework.

Any interdisciplinary research group has to recruit people with different backgrounds and they sure have some experience with how to make the chemist or mol.biologist they really need, fit in.
And it is not like every physicist knows the details about gene expression, protein folding or has actually imaged cells using lasers or AFM.

This actually makes me wonder how interdisciplinary groups in the US manage. If you are working in biophysics but your degree is biology and the coursework you require is advanced mol.bio courses and specialized biophysics lab courses, how does that work out? Seems this may lead to only certain undergrad degrees being accepted in a research group, because of the attached coursework. A research group, like a business, needs people with different backgrounds.

I didn't get the point of this post sorry.

 

[Delong]

Again, as mentioned earlier in this thread, you're going to want to speak to one of your previous professors (ideally, your former research supervisor), especially for advice here. If you appropriately tailored your personal statement/research interests to each school, being sure to tie what they have going on with your past experience/education, that's a reasonable measure. You want to make sure that you have some understanding of what research is being done there, and some expression of interest in that based on your previous experiences. I worked on photosynthesis as well as an undergraduate, and found it fascinating, but I wasn't quite so fixated on continuing with it - it may have been easier since I developed the sorts of 'somewhat specific' interests in membrane proteins, optical & magnetic spectroscopies, and bioinorganic systems, which are a bit more transferable (you can find these sorts of areas under investigations in plenty of places, while photosynthesis itself is a bit harder to find).

That's interesting point and I will consider it thank you.

 

[Delong]

Get that GPA up. Work harder.

My GPA is barely 3.0 am I doomed for continuing onto graduate school? I had a bad year of personal issues which dropped my grade down somewhat...

 

[Delong]

How do you think you're going to get into a PhD program if you have a 3.2 GPA? Engineering is most likely an easier path to repaying student loans but it's hard work. If you're not that into it you may become a mediocre engineer and then nobody wins.

My GPA is only 3.0 am I doomed for getting into grad school?

 

[Dr. Courtney]

My GPA is only 3.0 am I doomed for getting into grad school?

If you are content with a 3.0 for the rest of your undergrad, you are doomed for a life of mediocrity.

You have to want it. A 3.0 GPA for one year does not need to turn into a 3.0 GPA at graduation.

 

[Delong]

If you are content with a 3.0 for the rest of your undergrad, you are doomed for a life of mediocrity.

You have to want it. A 3.0 GPA for one year does not need to turn into a 3.0 GPA at graduation.

You don't understand that is my cumulative GPA I am no longer an undergrad I already graduated from college. I took a LOT of hard classes.

 

[Vanadium 50]

Delong, a 3.0 is very low. Very few schools are likely to accept this.

In grad school, a C is considered failing. A 3.0 average is therefore right on the edge of failing. If you're on the edge for undergrad, it is not promising for grad work.

 

[Delong]

Delong, a 3.0 is very low. Very few schools are likely to accept this.

In grad school, a C is considered failing. A 3.0 average is therefore right on the edge of failing. If you're on the edge for undergrad, it is not promising for grad work.

But I know I'm a good student and I know I'm intellectually capable. I took a lot of hard classes from different apartments. I was trying to do molecular biology and biochemistry while at the same quarter doing quantum mechanics or differential equations. I took so many tough classes throughout all six years of college I feel like my low GPA is more understandable that way.

I took way more classes than I needed for my major just for my own scientific interests.

Should I retake some classes in college then?

 

[micromass]

But I know I'm a good student and I know I'm intellectually capable.

But how will grad schools know this?

I took a lot of hard classes from different apartments. I was trying to do molecular biology and biochemistry while at the same quarter doing quantum mechanics or differential equations. I took so many tough classes throughout all six years of college I feel like my low GPA is more understandable that way.

This shows poor planning skills and a tendency to overestimate your abilities. Still not a good sign for grad school. Don't try to convince us, try to convince the grad school

 

[microMRI]

Are American grades inflated somehow or the exams are too easy? I read somewhere that in UK first class honors is 70%. My current Uni in Germany would give me the best grade (1.0) if I could get above 95% (no other way) and I just know a guy who could get 1.0 in most of the subjects (very rare).
Maybe most of the PF members are bright (which is quite likely), so 3.2 GPA is not good enough.

 

[micromass]

Are American grades inflated somehow or the exams are too easy? I read somewhere that in UK first class honors is 70%. My current Uni in Germany would give me the best grade (1.0) if I could get above 95% (no other way) and I just know a guy who could get 1.0 in most of the subjects (very rare).
Maybe most of the PF members are bright (which is quite likely), so 3.2 GPA is not good enough.

Yes, the grading system in the US is quite different from Europe. A 90% would be seen extremely good in my country in Europe, and it's usually just one or two students who pull this off. In the US, this seems very different. Also remember that the US use letter grades. The European culture and the US culture are very different.

 

[atyy]

Are American grades inflated somehow or the exams are too easy? I read somewhere that in UK first class honors is 70%. My current Uni in Germany would give me the best grade (1.0) if I could get above 95% (no other way) and I just know a guy who could get 1.0 in most of the subjects (very rare).
Maybe most of the PF members are bright (which is quite likely), so 3.2 GPA is not good enough.

Well, which is easier, to get 90% consistently or 70% consistently?

Anyway, it is not true that the A grade in the US is uniformly 90%. I've taken classes where the A grade is around 80% (and have heard, but not verified that there are classes where it was around 30-40% - apparently a quantum mechanics course at MIT where the brand new professor over estimated what was "easy"). I personally think 90% for an A is very hard, so I've avoided those, but had to do it once - it was a European exam (language exam administered by the Goethe Institut)! So I think your view is too generalized.

 

[micromass]

Well, which is easier, to get 90% consistent or 70% consistently?

It depends how the curve is and how tough the exams are.

 

[Delong]

But how will grad schools know this?
This shows poor planning skills and a tendency to overestimate your abilities. Still not a good sign for grad school. Don't try to convince us, try to convince the grad school

I was interested in a lot of different subjects. I know it's not a good habit for the long run in science but I was/am young and I couldn't decide on what subjects to focus on. I know I'm supposed to convince the graduate school I just feel like giving a public explanation right now. I know I'm not the most impressive student out there but all I've ever wanted to do in life was become a scientist I thoroughly love science and there's nothing I'd rather do with my life. I've made a lot of personal sacrifices for this very path I can't settle with any other career choice I just can't...

 

[Vanadium 50]

A 3.0 and taking six years to graduate is even worse, I'm afraid.

 

[Delong]

A 3.0 and taking six years to graduate is even worse, I'm afraid.

I took a lot of different classes, they aren't from all the same subject/major, that's why I took six years... I don't know I can't just give up. there is honestly nothing else I want to do with my life. I just can't accept "give up" as my answer...

 

[Delong]

I got accepted into an REU and I hear some REU's are harder to get into than graduate school. Doesn't that mean I'm capable of getting into graduate school as well? I know I'm not dumb I am a capable student everyone's answers here are really making me feel unstable and touchy...

 

[e.bar.goum]

I got accepted into an REU and I hear some REU's are harder to get into than graduate school. Doesn't that mean I'm capable of getting into graduate school as well? I know I'm not dumb I am a capable student everyone's answers here are really making me feel unstable and touchy...

Some REU's are harder to get into than graduate school. Not all. You know yourself better than we do, we only know the information that you have given us. Look, don't give up, but take the advice that people have given you -- narrow your focus, be realistic about what schools you can get into, make sure you have good letters of recommendation, talk to potential supervisors. Don't "give up", just be realistic, and do what you can to improve your chances.