How Can I Calculate Arc Length Without a Calculator?

Click For Summary
To calculate arc length without a calculator, the discussion centers on simplifying the integral involving the expression under the square root. Participants identify that the integrand can be rewritten to reveal a perfect square, which aids in simplification. There is a focus on correcting mistakes in squaring terms and ensuring proper grouping of like terms to facilitate integration. The conversation highlights the importance of careful arithmetic to avoid errors that complicate the process. Ultimately, recognizing and correcting these mistakes is crucial for successfully calculating arc length.
lastdayx52
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
2ng5rg7.jpg


How in gods name do I do that? I attempted that integral and... it just can't be integrated!

What I tried:
ih5obl.jpg


That doesn't help one bit... How do I do this? NOTE: No graphing calculator is to be used.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have as the integrand
\sqrt{1 + (x - 1/(4x))^2}
= \sqrt{1 + (x^2 - 1/2 + 1/16x^2)}

When you group together the only terms that can be grouped, you'll have a perfect square under the radical.
 
when you squared out the (x-x/4)^2 you should have got 1/2 not 3/2. this should simplify things hopefully cause you should be able to factorise the numerator into
sqrt[(4x^2+1)^2]
 
Mark44 said:
You have as the integrand
\sqrt{1 + (x - 1/(4x))^2}
= \sqrt{1 + (x^2 - 1/2 + 1/16x^2)}

When you group together the only terms that can be grouped, you'll have a perfect square under the radical.

Yes that gives me:
2945imx.jpg


However, what good is that, since there's still a 1 in there? I can't squareroot it to simplify...

latentcorpse said:
when you squared out the (x-x/4)^2 you should have got 1/2 not 3/2. this should simplify things hopefully cause you should be able to factorise the numerator into
sqrt[(4x^2+1)^2]

You do get 1/2, but I added a 1, therefore 3/2.
 
Mark44 said:
You have as the integrand
\sqrt{1 + (x - 1/(4x))^2}
= \sqrt{1 + (x^2 - 1/2 + 1/16x^2)}

When you group together the only terms that can be grouped, you'll have a perfect square under the radical.

Continuing from this point...
= \sqrt{x^2 + 1/2 + 1/16x^2}
The part under the radical is a perfect square. Surely you can take it from here!
 
OH... I added wrong... wow... Stupid mistakes FTL... Thanks all!
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K