How Can I Connect Two Cylinders Coaxially to Transfer Pulling Force?

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on creating a coupling system to connect two coaxial cylinders for transferring pulling forces via strings. The upper cylinder is hollow, while the lower cylinder features a clutch mechanism that allows for the connection of either string A or string B, depending on the ring's position. The challenge lies in effectively transferring an 80N pulling force while ensuring the mechanism functions regardless of the adapter's angular orientation. The clutch consists of three jaws that secure the adapter when the ring is turned, preventing separation or rotation of the cylinders. The user seeks innovative solutions to improve the design and functionality of this coupling system.
verfu
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
connecting two cylinders and at the same time strings inside them, with a twist of a ring on one of the cylinders
Hello everyone,

I’m trying to build a coupling system between two cylinders to connect them coaxially and transfer pulling force from a string on the surface of cylinder one to a string inside cylinder two. Please have a look at the sketches attached. Both of the cylinders have an outer diameter of 44mm and the upper one is hollow with an inner diameter of 22mm. On top of the lower cylinder sits a clutch which consists of a turnable ring and some elements which slide in and out radially. By turning the ring 60 degrees either clockwise or counter clockwise an adapter which sits on the upper cylinder gets stuck in the clutch. So there is one open position of the ring/clutch at 0° and two closed positions at -60° and 60°. Until here everything works fine.

Now to my problem. From outside the lower cylinder two strings enter the clutch below the ring. One of them is a loop and passes through the clutch. I want to be able to transfer either a pulling force of approximately 80N from string B to some structure inside the hollow upper cylinder (skipping the structure idea and connecting the strings from lower and upper cylinder directly would be even better but I didn’t find a solution for that) or a similar force from this structure to string A. Which of the strings is connected to this structure depends on in which closed position the ring is. So turning the ring to the left (-60°) should connect the structure to string A and turning it to the right (+60°) should connect the structure with string B. The mechanism should work no matter in which angular orientation I stick the adapter into the clutch. In the end I will 3d-print the whole thing and use dyneema ropes with a diameter of approximately 1mm as strings.

I’ve tried several solutions but none of them worked good enough. I would be really grateful if anyone would come up with an idea how to solve this problem.
 

Attachments

  • photo5936265894453948939.jpg
    photo5936265894453948939.jpg
    26.1 KB · Views: 314
  • photo5936265894453948940.jpg
    photo5936265894453948940.jpg
    29.7 KB · Views: 326
Engineering news on Phys.org
Your explanation is hard to follow, since schematics don't show A or B.
Could you elaborate about the clutch, the ring and the adapter?
 
Lnewqban said:
Your explanation is hard to follow, since schematics don't show A or B.
Could you elaborate about the clutch, the ring and the adapter?

In one of the schematics the two strings which go into the clutch are labeled "string A" and "string B".
I didn't go into detail on how the rest of the clutch works because my intention was to keep it as simple as possible.
There are three jaws in the clutch. When the ring is open they can slide radially outwards a bit. In the open position it is possible to press the adapter into the clutch. When the ring is then turned (60° or - 60°) those jaws slide towards the adapter and fixate it. Now it's not possible to pull the cylinders apart or rotate them against each other.
In this position I should be able to transfer a pulling force from the string in the uper cylinder to one of the strings in the lower.
 
What mathematics software should engineering students use? Is it correct that much of the engineering industry relies on MATLAB, making it the tool many graduates will encounter in professional settings? How does SageMath compare? It is a free package that supports both numerical and symbolic computation and can be installed on various platforms. Could it become more widely used because it is freely available? I am an academic who has taught engineering mathematics, and taught the...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 52 ·
2
Replies
52
Views
7K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
13K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
36K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
Replies
6
Views
8K
Replies
6
Views
11K
Replies
2
Views
10K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K