MHB How can I express f(z) in terms of z using exponentials?

  • Thread starter Thread starter aruwin
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Terms
aruwin
Messages
204
Reaction score
0
Hello! I am stuck at the final step. How do I get x+iy from the equation? Help!

I am so sorry for posting this question in a picture instead of writing it out, because I don't know how to write equations on here.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_6637.jpg
    IMG_6637.jpg
    59.6 KB · Views: 105
Physics news on Phys.org
aruwin said:
Hello! I am stuck at the final step. How do I get x+iy from the equation? Help!

I am so sorry for posting this question in a picture instead of writing it out, because I don't know how to write equations on here.

First, I would note that if $\displaystyle \begin{align*} z = x + \mathrm{i }\,y \end{align*}$ then $\displaystyle \begin{align*} z^2 = x^2 - y^2 + \mathrm{i }\left( 2\,x\,y \right) \end{align*}$, so $\displaystyle \begin{align*} x^2 - y^2 = \mathcal{R} \left( z^2 \right) \end{align*}$ and $\displaystyle \begin{align*} 2\,x\,y = \mathcal{I}\left( z^2 \right) \end{align*}$.

Next, notice that $\displaystyle \begin{align*} \sin{ \left( X + \mathrm{i}\,Y \right) } = \sin{(X)}\cosh{(Y)} + \mathrm{i}\cos{(X)}\sinh{(Y)} \end{align*}$, so it would suggest that $\displaystyle \begin{align*} X = x^2 - y^2 = \mathcal{R} \left( z^2 \right) \end{align*}$ and $\displaystyle \begin{align*} Y = 2\,x\,y = \mathcal{I} \left( z^2 \right) \end{align*}$.

Thus, we can conclude that $\displaystyle \begin{align*} f(z) = \sin{ \left( z^2 \right) } \end{align*}$.
 
Prove It said:
First, I would note that if $\displaystyle \begin{align*} z = x + \mathrm{i }\,y \end{align*}$ then $\displaystyle \begin{align*} z^2 = x^2 - y^2 + \mathrm{i }\left( 2\,x\,y \right) \end{align*}$, so $\displaystyle \begin{align*} x^2 - y^2 = \mathcal{R} \left( z^2 \right) \end{align*}$ and $\displaystyle \begin{align*} 2\,x\,y = \mathcal{I}\left( z^2 \right) \end{align*}$.

Next, notice that $\displaystyle \begin{align*} \sin{ \left( X + \mathrm{i}\,Y \right) } = \sin{(X)}\cosh{(Y)} + \mathrm{i}\cos{(X)}\sinh{(Y)} \end{align*}$, so it would suggest that $\displaystyle \begin{align*} X = x^2 - y^2 = \mathcal{R} \left( z^2 \right) \end{align*}$ and $\displaystyle \begin{align*} Y = 2\,x\,y = \mathcal{I} \left( z^2 \right) \end{align*}$.

Thus, we can conclude that $\displaystyle \begin{align*} f(z) = \sin{ \left( z^2 \right) } \end{align*}$.

Thanks! This is a faster method than using exponentials. But if I were to use exponentials, how do I do it? I got stuck here, look.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_6643.jpg
    IMG_6643.jpg
    29.1 KB · Views: 95
We all know the definition of n-dimensional topological manifold uses open sets and homeomorphisms onto the image as open set in ##\mathbb R^n##. It should be possible to reformulate the definition of n-dimensional topological manifold using closed sets on the manifold's topology and on ##\mathbb R^n## ? I'm positive for this. Perhaps the definition of smooth manifold would be problematic, though.

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
612
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K