How can i find out the density of 5M NaOH

  • Thread starter Thread starter microbus65
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Density
AI Thread Summary
To determine the density of a 5M NaOH solution, one can refer to density tables in handbooks like the CRC handbook, as approximations using mass and volume can lead to significant errors. Weighing a specific volume of the solution and measuring its mass is a practical method, though care must be taken due to the corrosive nature of NaOH. A cited density for the solution is 1.182 g/mL at 25°C, while calculations suggest a density of approximately 1.091 g/mL, indicating a notable discrepancy. The discussion emphasizes the importance of accurate density data, as errors can exceed 7% when using simplified methods. Accurate density determination is crucial for reliable chemical calculations and applications.
microbus65
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
how can i find out the density of 5M NaOH
 
Physics news on Phys.org


If you are in a course, you will learn this. Chemistry is a laboratory course. Density is a ratio of mass to volume. Do you have a 5 M solution of NaOH?

Otherwise, look in a handbook.
 


Work out how many moles of NaOH in a litre,
Work out the mass of 1 mole of NaOH, add to the mass of 1litre of water.
Thats the density (approximately - doesn't take into account the volume of the added NaOH)
 


mgb_phys said:
Work out how many moles of NaOH in a litre,
Work out the mass of 1 mole of NaOH, add to the mass of 1litre of water.
Thats the density (approximately - doesn't take into account the volume of the added NaOH)

In general - this is wrong. With such approximations you never know what the error is - and it can be everything. For ammonia you will estimate that 5M solution is around 1.085 g/mL, while in reality it is 0.963 g/mL. For sulfuric acid your estimate will be 1.49 g/mL - compare it to the real value of 1.29 g/mL. That means -11% and +16% errors.

The only correct approach is to use density tables from some handbook, like CRC handbook for example. There are short density tables on my site. Note, that in many hanbooks density tables contain only densities of solutions of given % w/w concentration, so you have to convert between M and %. That's not a simple one step operation, as to convert you have to know density first. So, you either do it iteratively (assume some density, convert, check new density in tables, use it to convert and so on, depending on the accuracy you need one or two iterations will be most likely enough) or you prepare M vs density table (that makes sense if you will be doing conversions often) or you look for some concentration calculator with built in density tables, that does conversion for you automatically :wink:
 


microbus65 said:
how can i find out the density of 5M NaOH

I would suggest a simple weighing trial however the basic solution may scratch the glassware ; simply measure out a certain volume of the solution and then weigh it however be sure to tare the measuring apparatus.
 


It is 1.182 g/mL at 25oC according to Sigma Aldrich.

Let's see what the error would be assuming no DV of mixing.

The density of solid NaOH is 1.829 (according to Wiki). We need 5*40.00 g for 5 moles which will be diluted with sufficient water to form 1 L. Assuming no DV of mixing, we will add 200.0 g or 109.4 mL (200.0 g/1.829 g/cm^3) to 890.6 mL of water (1000 mL - 109.4mL). This will give us the 1L we need and will weigh 1090.6 g for a density of 1.091. The relative percent mixing error is 100* (1.091 g/mL - 1.182 g/mL) / 1.182 g/mL = -7.699%

That's a little too much error for my liking.
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top