How Can I Improve Teaching Chemistry Concepts?

  • Context: Courses 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Physics_UG
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Chemistry Guidance
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on improving the teaching of chemistry concepts in a university pre-course designed to prepare students for undergraduate chemistry (U-Chem 1). The instructor covered essential topics such as significant figures, scientific notation, atomic structure experiments, stoichiometry, and bonding theories. For the remaining lectures, the instructor plans to address the Bohr model, quantum mechanics, Lewis structures, molecular orbital theory, gas laws, and solution equilibrium. Despite a solid plan, the instructor expressed disappointment in their delivery, particularly regarding complex topics like quantum mechanics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of significant figures and scientific notation
  • Familiarity with stoichiometry and chemical equations
  • Knowledge of atomic structure and experimental evidence (Thomson and Rutherford experiments)
  • Basic concepts of bonding theories (ionic, covalent, and hybridization)
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the Bohr model and its implications in atomic theory
  • Study quantum mechanics and atomic orbital filling
  • Learn about molecular orbital theory, including hybridization and bonding types
  • Investigate gas laws and their applications in chemical equilibrium
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for chemistry educators, university instructors preparing students for U-Chem, and anyone looking to enhance their teaching strategies in complex scientific topics.

Physics_UG
Gold Member
Messages
287
Reaction score
2
So I have been teaching this university chemistry pre-course that is meant to review all of the pre-req stuff needed for uchem 1 and the course is supposed to touch on some of the stuff the students will see in uchem 1. The course is 4 lectures, 3 hours/lecture. The last two lectures I covered really basic stuff. On the first lecture I covered all of the sig fig rules, scientific notation, SI system, unit conversions, and dimensional analysis. On the second lecture I discussed some of the experimental evidence that gives us a picture of the atomic structure (Thomson experiment, Rutherford experiment, etc), the definition of a mole, the definition of the amu and the standards used to define both quantities, and then I did a ton of stoichiometry problems and had them pair up in groups to work some on their own. I covered mass-mole, mass-molecule, and molecule-mole conversions, chemical equation balancing, stoichiometric calculations given a chemical reaction, limiting reagents, percent yield, and mass percent calculations. I also talked about the rules for naming binary ionic, binary covalent, and polyatomic atoms.

My question is, how do you recommend I spend the last 6 hours of lecture time in this course? Tomorrow I was planning on covering the bohr model and the qualtization of energy levels, and then I was going to discuss atomic/quantum orbital mechanics and how the orbitals fill. Then I figure I will talk about lewis structures, molecular orbital theory (orbital hybridization, sigma and pi bonds, etc), and maybe get into VSEPR theory if time permits. I will also go into more detail on non-covalent vs. polar-covalent vs. ionic bonding.

Friday I plan on covering the gas laws, solution equilibrium, the equilibrium constant, le chatlier's principle, calorimetry (hess law, heat capacity, etc), etc.

Do you think this is a good plan? Are there some things missing that I should consider adding in?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Physics_UG said:
My question is, how do you recommend I spend the last 6 hours of lecture time in this course? Tomorrow I was planning on covering the bohr model and the qualtization of energy levels, and then I was going to discuss atomic/quantum orbital mechanics and how the orbitals fill. Then I figure I will talk about lewis structures, molecular orbital theory (orbital hybridization, sigma and pi bonds, etc), and maybe get into VSEPR theory if time permits.
You hit my opinion right on the nose! I know a lot of people who struggle with part of Chemistry, it would definitely benefit someone going into U-Chem. Especially hybridization.
 
Well, the course is over. It went decent, but I think everything I explained came out garbled. lol. MY explanations seemed clear to me in my head when I explained the concepts to myself before giving the lectures, but when I got in front of the group and began speaking everything came out garbled...especially the quantum/orbital mechanics...I was getting lots of blank stares there.

All in all, I was rather disappointed in my performance. I guess it is a lesson learned, and it was good experience for me nonetheless.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
9K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K