How can I integrate sqrt(1+x^2)dx using substitution?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter braindead101
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integration
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the integration of the function sqrt(1+x^2) with respect to x, exploring various substitution methods including trigonometric and hyperbolic functions. Participants share their attempts, challenges, and alternative approaches to solve the integral.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant attempts the substitution x = tan(q) but struggles with the resulting integral of sec^3(q) and questions the validity of their approach.
  • Another participant suggests rewriting the integral using the identity for sec^2(x) and corrects a misunderstanding regarding sec(x) and sin(x).
  • A different approach is proposed using the substitution x = sinh(t), leading to a transformation involving hyperbolic functions.
  • Integration by parts is mentioned as an alternative method, although it is noted to be lengthy.
  • One participant expresses difficulty with the hyperbolic substitution and seeks clarification on how to integrate cosh^2(t). They share their work and the identities they are using.
  • Another participant provides a formula for cosh^2(x) to assist with the integration process.
  • Further discussion includes evaluating an iterated integral involving the original integral, with participants sharing their thoughts on the complexities involved.
  • One participant expresses frustration with the difficulty of the integral and questions whether they are approaching it in the right way.
  • Another participant reassures that with some techniques, the integral can be made easier, though specifics are not provided.
  • Finally, one participant reflects on their struggles with the integration process and expresses doubt about their major, indicating a personal challenge with the topic.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants present multiple competing views on the best method to integrate sqrt(1+x^2), with no consensus reached on a single approach. Various substitution methods are discussed, but challenges and uncertainties remain regarding their effectiveness.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express confusion over the integration steps and the relationships between hyperbolic and trigonometric functions. There are unresolved mathematical steps and assumptions about familiarity with certain techniques, such as hyperbolic functions and integration by parts.

braindead101
Messages
158
Reaction score
0
I can't seem to figure out how to integrate this.

integ ( sqrt (1+x^2) dx )

I am pretty sure I need to substitute the inside but I cannot figure out what. I have tried substituting x = tan theta, and i get stuck at integral (sec (theta)^3 dtheta)

here is my work: (I am goin to use q as theta)

integ ( sqrt (1+x^2) dx )
let tan q = x
sec^2q dq = dx

integ ( sqrt (1+tan^2q) sec^2 q dq )
= integ (sqrt (sec^2 q) sec^2 q dq ) (trig identity)
= integ (sec q (sex^2 q) dq)
= integ (sec^3 q dq)
= integ (1/sin^3 q dq)

and I am stuck here...
unless this is the wrong substitution, in which case, i have no clue.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Try \int{\sec{x}\sec^2{x}dx} = \int{\sec{x}\left(1+\tan^2{x}\right)dx}

And \sec{x} is \frac{1}{\cos{x}}, not \frac{1}{\sin{x}}. :wink:
 
Substitute x=\sinh t. And use a double angle formula for the hyperbolic functions.
 
You can also do it with integration by parts, it's pretty lengthy but you don't have to deal with hyperbolic or trig substitutions.
 
Dex's substitution gets you there the fastest, but you may not know about hyperbolic trig functions yet. You can use the x= tan theta substitution, but of course the resulting sec cubed integral is not the easiest. So if you really want to go that way, do integration by parts on the sec cubed integral, its actually not that lengthy compared to other elementary methods. You should get the sec cubed integral on both sides of the equation, then its just simple algebra.
 
I have tried to do the hyperbolic trig way because I am stuck on mine and I can't seem to integrate the sec^3q

this is what i have for hyperbolic, i am stuck and can't seem to integrate the last one

integ (sqrt (1+x^2)dx)
let x = sinh t
dx/dt = cosh t
integ (sqrt (1+sinh^2t) (cosh t dt))
identity: cosh^2t - sinh^2t = 1
integ (sqrt (cosh^2t) cosh t dt)
integ (cosh^2t dt)

how do i integrate this?
 
\cosh^2 x = \frac{1 + \cosh (2x)}{2}
 
okay, so I have done everything and integrated the whole thing, now because I have never learned about the hyperbolic function, i am having trouble doing this.

here is my work for the rest of the integration:
(previous work)
integ (sqrt (1+x^2)dx)
let x = sinh t
dx/dt = cosh t
integ (sqrt (1+sinh^2t) (cosh t dt))
identity: cosh^2t - sinh^2t = 1
integ (sqrt (cosh^2t) cosh t dt)
integ (cosh^2t dt)
(finishing it off)
integ ( (1+ cosh(2t))/2 dt)
= 1/2 integ ( 1+cosh(2t) dt)
= 1/2 [ t + 1/2 sinh (2t) ]

So my actual question was to evaluate this:
and now with the sinh, I am unsure how to evaluate this. What is the relationship between sinh and sin?

actual question:
\int^{1}_{0}\int^{1}_{y}\sqrt{1+x^{2}}dxdy
 
Well to do your iterated integral:

First finish off the anti derivative for the inner integral. To do this, first use the definition:
\sinh x = \frac{e^x - e^{-x}}{2}. We define the inverse function and call it argsinh. Also, use the following identitys (which you can verify from the definition): \sinh (2t) = 2 \sinh t \cosh t and \cosh^2 t - \sinh^2 t = 1

So now the anti derivative is \frac{ \argsinh x}{2} + \frac{x \sqrt{1+x^2}}{2}

Now, argsinh 1 = 0, because if you let x=0 into the sinh definition, you get 1.
The Inner integral is now thus: \frac{\sqrt{2}}{2} - \frac{ \argsinh y}{2} - \frac{y\sqrt{1+y^2}}{2}.

So now for the outer integral, the first part is very straightforward, the 3rd part just needs a substitution u=y^2+1. The only one that is somewhat difficult is the argsinh one, which you can get by integration by parts. First take the factor of 1/2 out of the integral, then let u= argsinh y, dv=dy.

Good luck
 
  • #10
okay, i have read this about 10 times trying to understand this, i have tried substituting everything into get the antiderivative you got, but i constantly get something different.
why is this integral so hard , am i doing it the hard way is there an easier way to compute this.
 
  • #11
Using some techniques, it's pretty easy.
 

Attachments

  • #12
i'm not sure if i can use the formula to help the integration because i also have this formula somewhere, but i don't see how else i can integrate without it as the solution with the hyperbolic substitution is too difficult for me.

nevermind i see how you did this, and i would have never known how to do this...
i clearly am in the wrong major
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K