How can I solve for the complex number z in sin(z) = i?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around solving the equation sin(z) = i, where z is a complex number. Participants explore various mathematical approaches to express and manipulate the sine function using exponential forms and logarithmic identities.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants attempt to expand sin(z) using exponential formulas and consider substituting variables to simplify the equation. Questions arise regarding the correct formulation of the sine function and the implications of using logarithms on both sides of the equation.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing insights and corrections to each other's approaches. Some have suggested alternative substitutions and transformations, while others express confusion about the implications of their findings and seek clarification on specific steps in the process.

Contextual Notes

There are indications of missing information regarding the interpretation of roots and their polar forms. Participants also reflect on the complexity of handling multiple solutions and the significance of angles in the complex plane.

Lavabug
Messages
858
Reaction score
37

Homework Statement



Calculate sin(z) = i

Homework Equations


Sin, cos, sinh, cosh exponential formulas?

The Attempt at a Solution



I tried expanding the sin out with exponentials, I think I could take e^iz and substitute that for z, so I'd have:

(z+ z^-1)/2i = i

Maybe I could multiply everything by z and find the roots of that polynomial aaand...?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Lavabug! :smile:

sin(z) = Im(…) ? :wink:
 
Lavabug said:

Homework Statement



Calculate sin(z) = i

Homework Equations


Sin, cos, sinh, cosh exponential formulas?

The Attempt at a Solution



I tried expanding the sin out with exponentials, I think I could take e^iz and substitute that for z, so I'd have:

(z+ z^-1)/2i = i

Maybe I could multiply everything by z and find the roots of that polynomial aaand...?
What's with the ellipsis? Why'd you stop here?
 
Lavabug said:
I tried expanding the sin out with exponentials, I think I could take e^iz and substitute that for z, so I'd have:

(z+ z^-1)/2i = i

Maybe I could multiply everything by z and find the roots of that polynomial aaand...?
It would be better to use a different variable, say w=eiz, so that you have

(w+w-1)/2i = i

Then do as you thought and solve for w. Once you have w, you can solve for z.
 
Hello there.

sin(z) is the imaginary part of... e^(iz) ? Here's a swing in the dark: Should I take ln on both sides, giving me:
iz = ln (i)

then writing i inside the log as e^(i*pi/2)?

so z = pi/2 ? No imaginary part?
 
I looked on Wiki and found this

0b7d3b2f55de29dee74d89e3125ccd77.png
 
Last edited by a moderator:
So you equate:
<br /> \sin x\cosh y+i\cos x\sinh y=i<br />
This tells you the form of x and the form of y...
 
Lavabug said:

Homework Statement



Calculate sin(z) = i

Homework Equations


Sin, cos, sinh, cosh exponential formulas?

The Attempt at a Solution



I tried expanding the sin out with exponentials, I think I could take e^iz and substitute that for z, so I'd have:

(z+ z^-1)/2i = i

Maybe I could multiply everything by z and find the roots of that polynomial aaand...?
Looks good to me- except that sin(z)= (z- z^(-1))/2i.

I see nothing wrong with (z-z^{-1})/2i= i then z- z^{-1}= -2.
(z-z^{-1})/2i= i then z- z^{-1}= -2.

Multiplying through by z, z^2- 1= -2z so z^2+ 2z-1= 0. That's kind of easy to solve isn't it?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Lavabug said:
(z+ z^-1)/2i = i
Looks like we all missed the fact you should have a minus sign between the two terms for sine. :redface:
 
  • #10
I went back and edited so I can pretend I didn't miss that!
 
  • #11
Thanks for the replies everyone, totally forgot about this thread. I got the roots \omega = -1 \pm \sqrt{2}
Now what am I supposed to do with them? I recall seeing a similar problem done in a book and they would just do the following:
z = \ln{([-1 \pm \sqrt{2}]e^{i\theta})}

Not sure what they did there, or what theta is in this case. Can someone please pick it up where I'm stuck?
 
  • #12
Lavabug said:
I got the roots \omega = -1 \pm \sqrt{2}
That's great! What is \omega?
 
  • #13
You have w=e^{iz}=-1\pm\sqrt{2}, so solve for z.
 
  • #14
I think I see it now, z would be -i*ln(roots). I'm a bit confused though, feel like I lost track of what I was doing after substituting for w and finding the roots.
 
  • #15
Lavabug said:
I think I see it now, z would be -i*ln(roots). I'm a bit confused though, feel like I lost track of what I was doing after substituting for w and finding the roots.
This is one of the most important ideas of mathematics. To solve a problem:
  1. Reduce it into an easier problem
  2. Solve the easier problem
  3. Use the solution to the easier problem to help solve the original problem
Step 1 frequently comes with a recipe for doing step 3 -- in this case, the relationship between z and \omega.
 
  • #16
Hi again, thanks for the replies. I think I understand it now, please correct me if I'm wrong: the angle in my solution should be pi (the angle that i forms with y=0 in the complex plane) + 2pi*k, which covers all possible z's that'll satisfy it.

I found a similar problem in a text: cosz = 2, and the solution was also the log of roots*e^i(arg). Where the arg was just 2piK, which I assume refers to an angle of 0 which is where "2" lies. Forgive me if I'm not being faithful to the vocabulary of complex numbers.
 
  • #17
That's not right.

You have two roots, w_1 = -1+\sqrt{2} and w_2 = -1-\sqrt{2}. Express those in polar form w=re^{i\theta}, then take their logs.
 
  • #18
vela said:
That's not right.

You have two roots, w_1 = -1+\sqrt{2} and w_2 = -1-\sqrt{2}. Express those in polar form w=re^{i\theta}, then take their logs.

Ok so I'd have w = \sqrt{3} e^{i\theta}
which works for both of the roots(theta is zero + 2piK because they lie on y=0 on the first quadrant).

But how am I going to put the roots in my solution? I'm not seeing the connection.
 
  • #19
Try again. Note that both roots are purely real. There's no imaginary part. Also, for a positive real number, the argument is 0, but here, both roots aren't positive.
 

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K