How Can I Solve the Equation \(2^x = x^{10}\)?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dell
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around solving the equation \(2^x = x^{10}\), which involves concepts from algebra and numerical methods. Participants explore different approaches to find solutions, including logarithmic manipulation and the Lambert W function.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to manipulate the equation using logarithms but expresses frustration at not progressing. Some participants suggest that an explicit solution may not be possible, while others introduce numerical methods as a potential approach.

Discussion Status

Participants are exploring various methods, including numerical solutions and the Lambert W function. There is a recognition that numerical methods may be more effective, and some guidance has been offered regarding specific techniques like Newton's method.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of the limitations in finding an exact solution, and the discussion includes references to specific numerical results and methods, indicating a focus on practical approaches rather than theoretical solutions.

Dell
Messages
555
Reaction score
0
2^x=x^10

ln(2^x)=ln(x^10)
x*ln(2)=10*ln(x)
ln(2)/10=ln(x)/x

from here how can i solve this??

i seem to keep on going in circles
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You won't be able to find an explicit or exact answer for this kind of problem.
 
how can i go about it then?
 
Numerically. Maple gives 1.077550150.
 
...n
 
Last edited:
i looked the Lambert W function up, and using it i get,

2x=x10
(21/10)x=x
1=x/(21/10)x =====> (21/10)=a
1=x/ax
1=x*e-x*ln(a)
-ln(a)=[(-ln(a)*x)*e(-ln(a)*x)

after applying W to each side

-ln(a)*x=W(-ln(a))
x=W(-ln(a)/-ln(a))

is this correct, and also how do i get a numerical answer for this??
 
You might as well have solved the original equation numerically.
 
how would i have done that
 
Newton's method for one.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K