How Can I Start Learning Numerical Simulations for Modeling Gamma-Ray Bursts?

AI Thread Summary
To learn numerical simulations for modeling gamma-ray bursts, foundational knowledge in stellar structure equations is essential, typically covered in undergraduate astrophysics courses. While MATLAB can be used for basic modeling of stars in hydrostatic equilibrium, more complex simulations, especially for stellar collapse, require advanced codes. MESA, a FORTRAN-based code, is recommended for beginners to explore stellar evolution, though it has limitations for simulating supernovae. For more complex events, including three-dimensional simulations, codes like FLASH may be necessary. Starting with MESA provides a solid foundation before tackling more advanced simulations.
ajit.phys
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
I intend to learn numerical simulations of collapsing stars. Could you suggest me some useful resources? i am familiar with matlab.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Well, the basics of stellar simulation are grounded in the stellar structure equations, which any undergraduate stellar astrophysics course would cover. And even with MATLAB there are definitely things you can do to model stars, but only stars that are in hydrostatic equilibrium. When it comes to modeling the time evolution of stars, especially stellar collapse, you need a full code to do that, and it's non-trivial to make. If you want to see stellar structure codes in action, check out MESA (which is written in FORTRAN):

http://mesa.sourceforge.net/

But a one-dimensional code can't possibly model supernovae, which we now know are fully three-dimensional events. For that you would need a more complex code and there are definitely some out there that can do it to some extent (e.g. the FLASH code) but you'll want to be familiar with the simple 1D codes first.
 
Thanks a lot, Dan. Really appreciate it. Probably, i should start with MESA.
 
MESA is lots of fun to work with just for seeing normal stellar evolution in action, and I have been able to get some stellar explosions (e.g. novae, x-ray bursts) to be modeled through it; but collapse and supernova events are too much for it. Nevertheless, it's a very advanced modern code, and can do (or reasonably simulate) nearly everything else.
 
Well, my intention is to ultimately simulate a model GRB. Perhaps that's too far fetched. Nevertheless, one has to start with the basics first. thanks again.
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Back
Top