How can I think of rotational diffusion inverse seconds?

AI Thread Summary
Rotational diffusion describes the motion of particles, like rods, rotating in a fluid, quantified in inverse seconds (1/s). This concept can be visualized by considering the angular displacement of the particle's ends over time, akin to tracing a path on a sphere. For instance, a rotational diffusion coefficient (D_r) of 10 s^-1 indicates a certain angular movement compared to a higher value of 100 s^-1, which suggests faster rotation. The discussion emphasizes understanding rotational diffusion in terms of angular displacement rather than linear distance. Overall, visualizing this motion involves imagining the distance traced by the particle's ends on a sphere over a given time.
Steve Drake
Messages
53
Reaction score
1
When thinking of a spherical shaped particle moving about under Brownian motion, one describes its motion by Diffusion. The units being \frac{m^2}{s} I can understand this physically as a distance it will travel from a certain point in space averaged over x-y and z direction.
Now rotational diffusion on the other hand has units of inverse seconds \frac{1}{s} I cannot think of a way to visualize that? For e.g. a rod shaped particle, what does a
D_r = 10\, s^{-1} as opposed to say a D_r = 100\, s^{-1} mean? How can I visualize this like I can with a sphere moving an actual distance?
Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Think of rotational diffusion as having units radian2/s instead of 1/s.
 
Hi, Thanks

That makes a big more sense...

So in a geometrical sense... if a rod's center of mass with fixed in a liquid somehow, but it could still rotate around that point, does this mean the distance its ends would 'trace' out on a hypothetical sphere in 1 second would equal eg 40 radians?... I am still a bit confused thanks
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top