How Can Kinetic Energy and Velocity Be Calculated at the Bottom of a Hill?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Cali10
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hill Physics
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating kinetic energy and velocity for a scenario involving a girl and her bicycle descending from a hill. The problem includes parameters such as mass and height, and it falls under the subject area of energy conservation in physics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the conservation of energy principle, suggesting that potential energy at the top of the hill is converted into kinetic energy at the bottom. There are questions about how to apply the relevant formulas and the steps needed to solve for kinetic energy and velocity.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on using the conservation of energy approach, indicating that potential energy can be equated to kinetic energy. There are ongoing attempts to clarify the calculations and ensure understanding of the relationships between the variables involved.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted sense of urgency due to an upcoming test, and participants express varying levels of confidence in their understanding of the material. Some participants question the accuracy of their calculations, particularly regarding the velocity obtained.

Cali10
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
(An explanation)
My physics teacher recently passed away, and had been absent due to his illness.
We had last started on acceleration, but the substitute had been working us on Kinetic, Potential energy, and Momentum.

We're having a test, and like myself, none of my classmates are ready, we've discussed this with the substitute, and the other physics teacher, whom I've already tried getting help from, is making us have this test Friday.

I literally have NO idea what I'm doing, I've looked up formulas, but I still don't understand what the heck I'm doing!

If any of you would be so great to help me, or explain how to do it, I would be so thankful!

- Cali

Homework Statement



A girl with a mass of 40 kg on a bicycle with a mass of 19 kg is at the top of a hill that is 22 m high. What is the kinetic energy of the girl and the bicycle as she arrives at the bottom of the hill?


How fast will the girl and the bicycle be going at the bottom of the hill?

Homework Equations



So I know the equation for Kinetic energy is KE = 1/2*M*V2

But I don't understand how to find it if its at the bottom of the hill?

And for the second part, I don't understand how to do it at all.



The Attempt at a Solution



I've tried, but I don't know exactly how to start it off, or anything.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A girl with a mass of 40 kg on a bicycle with a mass of 19 kg is at the top of a hill that is 22 m high. What is the kinetic energy of the girl and the bicycle as she arrives at the bottom of the hill?
Welcome to PF, Cali.
Start with PE at top = KE at bottom
Fill in the formula for PE, then the numbers and you can calculate the answer.

For the speed at the bottom, use
PE at top = KE at bottom
Put in the formula for KE and the number you got earlier for PE. Solve for v.
 
Welcome to PF!

Hi Cali! Welcome to PF! :smile:

(try using the X2 icon just above the Reply box :wink:)
Cali10 said:
girl with a mass of 40 kg on a bicycle with a mass of 19 kg is at the top of a hill that is 22 m high. What is the kinetic energy of the girl and the bicycle as she arrives at the bottom of the hill?

How fast will the girl and the bicycle be going at the bottom of the hill?

So I know the equation for Kinetic energy is KE = 1/2*M*V2

But I don't understand how to find it if its at the bottom of the hill?

You need to use conservation of energy …

KE + PE = constant, where KE = 1/2 mv2 and PE = mgh (h is height),

ie KEi + PEi = KEf + PEf .

The idea is that the potential energy lost (by reducing height) is converted into increased kinetic energy (by increasing speed).

Try it! :smile:
 


tiny-tim said:
Hi Cali! Welcome to PF! :smile:

(try using the X2 icon just above the Reply box :wink:)


You need to use conservation of energy …

KE + PE = constant, where KE = 1/2 mv2 and PE = mgh (h is height),

ie KEi + PEi = KEf + PEf .

The idea is that the potential energy lost (by reducing height) is converted into increased kinetic energy (by increasing speed).

Try it! :smile:


So once I get the PE, Do I plug that into KE?
And after that I do what?


Delphi51 said:
Welcome to PF, Cali.
Start with PE at top = KE at bottom
Fill in the formula for PE, then the numbers and you can calculate the answer.

For the speed at the bottom, use
PE at top = KE at bottom
Put in the formula for KE and the number you got earlier for PE. Solve for v.

Okay, so for the first part I got 12,720, and when I worked the second part I got 424.
 
Hi Cali! :smile:

(just got up :zzz: …)
Cali10 said:
Okay, so for the first part I got 12,720

Yup! :smile:
… , and when I worked the second part I got 424.

erm :redface: … 424 metres per second on a bike?? :biggrin:

Useful tip: always write out your formula (with m g v etc) first, and then you're less likely to make a mistake! :wink:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
13K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K