How Can Monotone Functions Have Only Countably Many Discontinuities?

  • Thread starter Thread starter MathematicalPhysicist
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Points Set
MathematicalPhysicist
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
4,662
Reaction score
372
i have a function f:R->R where f is monotone increasing, i need to show that the set of discontinuous points of f is at most countable.
so i need to find an injective or 1-1 mapping from this set to the naturals, or to the rationals.
i thought perhaps defining the next function g:A->Q, where A is the set of discontinuous points of f, by:
let x0 be in A, so lim(x>x0)f(x)>lim(x<x0)f(x)
g(x0)=x0 if x0 is in Q
but how do i define for points which arent in Q?

thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First, the correct phrase is "points of discontinuity of f", not "discontinuous points". Points are not "continuous" or "discontinuous", only functions are!

Have you already shown that a discontinuity of an increasing function must be a "jump" discontinuity- that is, that the left and right limits exist but are different? You need that to be able to talk about "lim(x>x0)f(x)>lim(x<x0)f(x)". But I don't see how your idea is going to work. Your g(x) doesn't actually use "lim(x>x0)f(x)>lim(x<x0)f(x)" It just says g(x)= x if f is discontinuous at x- and assumes f is discontinous at x! You mistake is looking at the domain instead of the range.

Try this. Let lim_{x\rightarrow x_0^-} f(x)= a, lim_{x\rightarrow x_0^+} f(x)= b. Since f has only "jump" discontinuities, those exist and a< b. There exist at least one rational number in the interval (a,b). Let g(x0) be such a rational number. Because f is an increasing function, if x0, x1 are points of discontinuities of f, x1> x0, then the "a" corresponding to x1 is greater than the "b" corresponding to x0: the two intervals do not overlap and so g(x_0)&lt; g(x_1). g is a one-to-one function from A to a subset of Q.
 
how have you defined the function g, i mean i don't see any explicit definition of the function, and how do you deal with points of discontinuity which are irrational, obviously they arent mapped into Q.
 
All I can do is repeat what I said- If xi is a point of discontinuity of the increasing function f. Then lim_{x\rightarrow x_i^-} f(x)= a_i, lim_{x\rightarrow x_i^+} f(x)= b_i exist and ai< bi.
Choose a rational number yi in the interval (a,b). Such a rational number certainly exists, just choose one. Define g(xi)= yi. Since, if xj> xi, as I said before, since f is increasing, bi< aj so the intervals do not overlap and y_j\ne y_i. g is a one-to-one function from the set of points of discontinuity of f into Q. Whether xi is rational or not is irrelevant. The corresponding g(xi) is yi which is, by definition, rational.
 
shouldn't it be:
b_i>a_j?
 
No! That's the whole point. If a_j&lt; b_i&lt; b_j then the two intervals overlap so it's possble that y_i= y_j and the function may not be one-to-one.

Because f is increasing, if x_i&lt; x_j, then the limit at xi from above must be less than the limit at xj from below: b_i&lt; a_j.
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Back
Top