How can the change-base identity be used to prove this equation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter tahayassen
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Identity
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on proving an equation using the change-base identity in logarithms. Participants clarify the distinction between two expressions involving exponents, emphasizing the order of operations in exponentiation. One user explains that to prove the equation, one should evaluate the left-hand side and right-hand side independently, applying the change-base identity. There is also a suggestion to learn LaTeX for clearer mathematical communication. Overall, the conversation highlights the importance of understanding the properties of exponents and logarithms for accurate proofs.
tahayassen
Messages
269
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



http://img843.imageshack.us/img843/3826/help3c.png

Homework Equations



Not applicable.

The Attempt at a Solution



http://img810.imageshack.us/img810/5577/help2n.png

Can anyone prove this by evaluating the left side and right side independent of each other?

http://img827.imageshack.us/img827/9757/helpdi.png

Can someone explain why this is incorrect? I'm so confused.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
tahayassen said:

Homework Statement



http://img843.imageshack.us/img843/3826/help3c.png

Homework Equations



Not applicable.

The Attempt at a Solution



http://img810.imageshack.us/img810/5577/help2n.png

Can anyone prove this by evaluating the left side and right side independent of each other?

http://img827.imageshack.us/img827/9757/helpdi.png

Can someone explain why this is incorrect? I'm so confused.

2^{3^4} = 2^{81} = 2417851639229258349412352, \mbox{ while } 2 \times 3 \times 4 = 24. In fact, ((x^a)^b)^c = x^{a b c}, as you have recognized, but that is _very_ different from x^{a^{b^c}}, which you are confused about. Look at the brackets: in ((x^a)^b)^c we first compute x^a, then take the bth power of that, then take the cth power of the result. In x^[a^(b^c)] we first compute b^c, then raise a to that power, then raise x to the result.

RGV
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Ray Vickson said:
2^{3^4} = 2^{81} = 2417851639229258349412352, \mbox{ while } 2 \times 3 \times 4 = 24. In fact, ((x^a)^b)^c = x^{a b c}, as you have recognized, but that is _very_ different from x^{a^{b^c}}, which you are confused about. Look at the brackets: in ((x^a)^b)^c we first compute x^a, then take the bth power of that, then take the cth power of the result. In x^[a^(b^c)] we first compute b^c, then raise a to that power, then raise x to the result.

RGV

Interesting. Thanks for the clarification.

If anyone is wondering what I meant by evaluating each side independent of each other, I meant evaluating the left-hand side, and then evaluating the right-hand side, and then after they look exactly the same, you can conclude that the left-hand side equals the right-hand side. Unfortunately, this is the only way my school accepts proofs.
 
Operating only on the LHS: you first prove the relation to change base and then use that identity, vis:LHS=\log_{(a^b)}(c^d) = \frac{\log_a(c^d)}{\log_a(a^b)} = \frac{d\;\log_a(c)}{b}=RHS...

(If you have already done the proof [change-base identity], i.e. in class, you can just refer to it; and if you haven't, you can look it up.)

Aside: it is probably worth your while learning LaTeX rather than posting images.
It helps us too since we can then copy and paste from your post to edit your equations.
 
Simon Bridge said:
Operating only on the LHS: you first prove the relation to change base and then use that identity, vis:LHS=\log_{(a^b)}(c^d) = \frac{\log_a(c^d)}{\log_a(a^b)} = \frac{d\;\log_a(c)}{b}=RHS...

(If you have already done the proof [change-base identity], i.e. in class, you can just refer to it; and if you haven't, you can look it up.)

Aside: it is probably worth your while learning LaTeX rather than posting images.
It helps us too since we can then copy and paste from your post to edit your equations.

Thanks! That helped a ton! :)

@LaTeX: I looked at the tutorial, and it looked rather complicated... I've been using Daum Equation Editor (a chrome extension) and it has a beautiful interface. I'll learn LaTeX as soon as this semester is over though.

http://img860.imageshack.us/img860/1480/32446906.png
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...
Essentially I just have this problem that I'm stuck on, on a sheet about complex numbers: Show that, for ##|r|<1,## $$1+r\cos(x)+r^2\cos(2x)+r^3\cos(3x)...=\frac{1-r\cos(x)}{1-2r\cos(x)+r^2}$$ My first thought was to express it as a geometric series, where the real part of the sum of the series would be the series you see above: $$1+re^{ix}+r^2e^{2ix}+r^3e^{3ix}...$$ The sum of this series is just: $$\frac{(re^{ix})^n-1}{re^{ix} - 1}$$ I'm having some trouble trying to figure out what to...
Back
Top