How can the density, area, and velocity be related in a cyclic fluid flow?

doctordoom
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
[PLAIN]http://img811.imageshack.us/img811/4882/stumped.png

So from the above question I presume that the relation (Density)x(Area1)x(Velocity1)=(Density)x(Area2)x(Velocity2), cannot be applied due to the flow being unsteady and thus the control volume changing with time.

I've read up about steady in the mean flow conditions and since the flow alteration is cyclic (sin wave) that might be applied.

Other than that I'm stumped.

Can anyone out there please give me some advice on this!

-Many thanks in advance.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I think it's nothing but a matter of confusion from the wording of the problem. Use you equations for velocity for both the entrance and exit.

From each velocity equation, take the derivative with respect to time to find the acceleration of each. The accelerations will be different as implied.
 
Thank you for your response. I still believe there is a major catch to this question, since it's unsteady flow and hence the control volume boundary fluctuates.

Anyone else with ideas. I've been looking through textbooks and can only find a question with a straight pipe that's similar to this!

Please help!
 
I agree with Phrak.

Since the sound propagation time (roughly 1 ms or less) is a lot less than the period of oscillation (about 20 s), you can use the mass conservation equation for this problem.
 
Redbelly98 said:
I agree with Phrak.

Since the sound propagation time (roughly 1 ms or less) is a lot less than the period of oscillation (about 20 s), you can use the mass conservation equation for this problem.

Thank you so much for that explanation.

Regards.
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K