How can the line passing through two points be represented by a vector equation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter EngageEngage
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Vector
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
5 replies · 7K views
EngageEngage
Messages
203
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Let A and B be the two points with position vectors A and B. Show that the line passing through thezse points may be represented by the vector equation:

R = sA + tB


Homework Equations


R = Ro + tV
where Ro is a point on the line and t is some scalar, and V is a vector pointing in the direction of the line.


The Attempt at a Solution



I have tried writing R = A + t(A - B)
and R = B + s(A - B), and manipulating the equations, however, i don't find the solution they are looking for. Could someone please help me get started on this? thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It would help a lot if you said what s and t are! One thing I note is that they cannot be independent parameters- two parameters would give the equation of a plane. I notice that if s= 0 and t= 1, then R= B. And if s= 1 and t= 0, R= A. In order that this give a line the equation relating s and t must be linear. Now, what linear function, s= at+ b, gives s= 0 when t= 1 and s= 1 when t= 0? I think there is a good change that when you get the answer you will say, "Oh, of course!"
 
s + t = 1 is the relationship i suppose, however, I cannot use this to show the desired relationship. Is it a matter of manipulating the equations i came up with, or should I try something else? Also, thank you for the help
 
Okay, so you know R = A + t(A - B) is the equation of the line, right? Play around with this and see if you can't get it to look something like something*A + something*B.
 
R = B + sA - sB = B(1-s)+ sA = Bt + sA.
Indeed, thanks a lot for all the help!
 
EngageEngage said:
s + t = 1 is the relationship i suppose, however, I cannot use this to show the desired relationship. Is it a matter of manipulating the equations i came up with, or should I try something else? Also, thank you for the help
Would the "manipulation" going from s+ t= 1 to s= 1- t be too difficult? Replace s by 1- t in your equation and see what happens.