How Can the Lorentz Group Be Represented on \(\mathbb{R}^{4^n}\)?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the representation of the Lorentz group on spaces of the form \(\mathbb{R}^{4^n}\). The original poster seeks to demonstrate that the Lorentz group has representations on any space \(\mathbb{R}^d\) for \(d = 4n\) and to explore the irreducibility of these representations, particularly for \(n > 1\).

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the use of tensors in index notation and symmetry properties to approach the problem. Some express uncertainty about how to start, while others suggest examining the Lie algebra structure and its exponentiation. There are mentions of irreducible representations acting on spinors and the need to consult textbooks for deeper insights.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants offering various perspectives on how to approach the problem. Some suggest looking into the Lie algebra and its representations, while others question the clarity of the problem statement itself. There is no explicit consensus on the best approach yet, but several productive lines of inquiry are being explored.

Contextual Notes

Participants note potential confusion regarding the problem's wording, particularly the distinction between \(d = 4n\) and \(d = 4^n\). There are also references to the expectations of prior knowledge based on the problem's origin from a past exam paper.

the1ceman
Messages
28
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


i) Show that the Lorentz group has representations on any space [tex]\mathbb{R}^d[/tex]
for
any d = 4n with n = 0, 1, 2, . . .. Show that those with n > 1 are not
irreducible. (Hint: here it might be useful to work with tensors in index
notation and to think of symmetry properties.)

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I have no idea where to begin, i do however know how to show that they are not irreducible.
I mean if this was R^4 tensor itself n times than i could form rank (n,0) tensors, but this is R^4^n, which has vectors as elements, with 4^n components. Please help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Anyone?
 
Come on ppl someone must know!
 
Seriously, this problem is by no means trivial and you just have to crank it out or consult some Lie groups book.

Look at the lie algebra structure (tangent space at identity) first and then you can exponentiate the lie algebra representation. The irreducible representations are actions on spinors. You should be able to find those info in standard QFT books.
 
tim_lou said:
Look at the lie algebra structure (tangent space at identity) first and then you can exponentiate the lie algebra representation. The irreducible representations are actions on spinors. You should be able to find those info in standard QFT books.

It cannot be this long, because this question is part of question from a past exam paper. Either there is a mistake in the question and the R^d should actually mean
[tex] \mathbb{R}\otimes\mathbb{R}\otimes\cdots\otimes\mathbb{R}[/tex]
d times(in which case the question is ok) or there are reps of the lorentz group on eg R^16 which i do not know about.
 
if it's from past exam paper, the professor probably expects you to know the results and derivations already.

Like I said, the answer is actions on spinors, given by
[tex]e^{-i\omega_{\mu\nu}S^{\mu\nu}}[/tex]

where [itex]S^{\mu\nu}=[J^\mu, J^\nu][/itex] are the spin operators (I might be missing a factor of 2 or i). The derivations are very nontrivial but the results are standard. You can start by looking at the lie algebra of the lorentz group. You'll get 3 spin operators and 3 boost operators. You take linearly combinations and find out that the lie algebra separates. The representation for the lie algebra is then a direction sum of two spin. You can then exponentiate this lie algebra to get the corresponding lie group.

There is no way I can derive all these without seeing how they were done first. I suggest you consult some textbooks. Srednicki's book on QFT has a good chapter on this matter and Peskin's QFT has a guided multi-part problem that leads you to this result.
 
Last edited:
Has everyone forgotten about trivial actions and direct sums?
 
Oh, wait, I think I might have misread your problem. I thought the problem asks for finding all representations of the Lorentz group. I apologize.

Instead, it asks for showing that for real representations of d=4n, the representation is reducible. I can't think of a good strategy right away. I believe you need to work through the commutation relations of Lie algebra and make some clever observations.
 
Hurkyl said:
Has everyone forgotten about trivial actions and direct sums?

Ah yes! I will try this thanks.
 
  • #10
Woops i made a mistake! d=4^n not d=4n. So that the direct sum method of fundamental reps will not work. Instead i was thinking of this: Is, for example
[tex]\mathbb{R}^4\otimes\mathbb{R}^4\cong\mathbb{R^{16}} ?[/tex]
Then the tensor product of the fund (or trivial) rep with itself is also a rep of R^16 ? Is this correct?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
6K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
6K