How Can V Be Transformed into Different Algebraic Structures?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dragonfall
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Turning
Dragonfall
Messages
1,023
Reaction score
5
What sort of operations can you pair up with V (class of all sets in ZFC) that turns it into various algebraic structures? For example, symmetric difference turns it into a group.

Now you must wave your hands a little since the algebraic structures are technically sets, and so are the functions, etc.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For instance, a forgetful functor U:R Mod \rightarrow Set has a left adjoint F such that X \mapsto FX, which generates a free R-module using a basis set. So a free construction generates an algebraic structure using a set.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forgetful_functor" is the description from wiki,

"As this a fundamental example of adjoints, we spell it out: adjointness means that given a set X and an object (say, an R-module) M, maps of sets correspond to maps of modules : every map of sets yields a map of modules, and every map of modules comes from a map of sets."

Hom_{Mod R}(Free_{R}(X), M) = Hom_{Set}(X, Forget(M))
 
Last edited by a moderator:
How would you turn V into a field?
 
Dragonfall said:
How would you turn V into a field?

I think a http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Construction_of_the_real_numbers" would do.

"A Dedekind cut in an ordered field is a partition of it, (A, B), such that A is nonempty and closed downwards, B is nonempty and closed upwards, and A contains no greatest element. Real numbers can be constructed as Dedekind cuts of rational numbers."

As you know, rational numbers can be constructed using integers and integers can be constructed using natural numbers that can be constructed using sets from constructivists' view. For above situations, the operators for algebraic structures can be converted into set operators.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...

Similar threads

Back
Top