How Can We Determine the Value of p to Make Three Vectors Coplanar?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ryoukomaru
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    3d Vectors
Ryoukomaru
Messages
55
Reaction score
0
I don't have the question with me so I ll just describe it to you. It was a test question.

I was given 3 vectors \vec u, \vec v, \vec w and \vec w had an unknown parameter p in it.

We were supposed to calculate a value for p such that the three vectors are coplanar.

What I did was find the cross product of \vec uand \vec v and then take the scalar product of the product of \vec {uv} and \vec w and make it equal to 0 and solve for p, i.e. (\vec{u} \times \vec{v}).\vec w=0
Now apparently this was the correct answer but I do not understand how it proves that they are coplanar. Because scalar product just shows that they are perpendicular and thus the vector is parallel to the plane. But can't it just as well be below or above the plane ? :confused:
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Basically in a linear space all the vectors are starting at the same origin 0, (the components just indicate the length in every direction), so that the plane is containing 0 and the vector w is in your case parallel to the plane and also passing in 0, so it's completely in the plane. (0 has to be contained in every subspace, since it is in the definition of a vector space)

Working with affine space allow every vector to have a different origin.
 
The scalar triple product (u x v) dot w can be interpreted as a determinant.
The determinant can be regarded as the signed volume of a parallelepiped ("a box with parallel sides") with sides given by the sequence of row vectors. If that volume is zero, then it's as if the box were flat. That is, the row vectors lie on a common plane.
 
I see. Now that makes sense. Thx a lot. :)
*
 
Also, the cross product produces a vector perpendicular to both vectors. If the dot product of another vector with that cross product is zero, the vector is also orthogonal to the cross product, and hence coplanar with the first two vectors.

Just another way to think about it.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top