MHB How Can You Calculate the Area of a Triangle in an Orthogonal Coordinate System?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Petrus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Area Triangle
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the area of a triangle in an orthogonal coordinate system with vertices at (-4,1), (1,4), and (-5,10), several methods can be employed. One effective approach involves using the vector cross product to find the area of the corresponding parallelogram and then dividing by two. Alternatively, the area can also be determined using a formula specifically designed for triangles formed by three points in a plane. For those seeking a more traditional method, calculating the lengths of each side and applying Heron's Formula is another viable option. These methods provide various ways to accurately determine the area of the triangle.
Petrus
Messages
702
Reaction score
0
In an orthogonal cordinate system determine the area of the triangle with vertices in $$(-4,1)$$, $$(1,4)$$ and $$(-5,10)$$ There is prob many way to solve it so go ahead with your method:) I made a hint for vector method.
Hint
The area of a triangle is half of the area of parallelogram
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Re: Area

The vector cross product, I believe (or the magnitude thereof) gives the area of the corresponding parallelogram. Hence, divide by two to get the answer. I get
$$[ \langle -4,1,0 \rangle- \langle 1,4,0 \rangle] \times [ \langle -4,1,0 \rangle- \langle -5,10,0 \rangle]= \langle -5,-3,0 \rangle \times \langle 1,-9,0 \rangle$$
$$= \left| \begin{matrix} \hat{i} & \hat{j} & \hat{k}\\ -5 &-3 &0 \\ 1 &-9 &0\end{matrix} \right| = \hat{k}((-5)(-9)-(-3)(1))= \hat{k}(45+3)=48 \hat{k}.$$
Hence, the area of the triangle is $24$ units squared.
 
Re: Area

Using the formula I developed http://www.mathhelpboards.com/f49/finding-area-triangle-formed-3-points-plane-2954/, we find:

$$A=\frac{1}{2}|(-5+4)(4-1)-(1+4)(10-1)|=\frac{48}{2}=24$$
 
Re: Area

Petrus said:
In an orthogonal cordinate system determine the area of the triangle with vertices in $$(-4,1)$$, $$(1,4)$$ and $$(-5,10)$$ There is prob many way to solve it so go ahead with your method:) I made a hint for vector method.
Hint
The area of a triangle is half of the area of parallelogram

If you get really desperate, you could work out the length of each side of the triangle by evaluating the distance between each set of points, and then use Heron's Formula.
 
Re: Area

The good old fashion method. The slope between the points (-4,1) and (1,4) is $$\frac{3}{5}. $$So the slope of a line perpendicular to it is $$-\frac{5}{3}$$This gives the two equations $$y-1=\frac{3}{5}(x+4)$$ the equation of the line perpendicular is $$y-10=-\frac{5}{3}(x+5)$$ Solving the system for the point of intersection gives $$\left(-\frac{13}{17},\frac{50}{17} \right)$$ The length of each line segment can now be calculated $$b=\int_{-4}^{1}\sqrt{1+(\frac{3}{5})^2}dx=\frac{24}{17} \sqrt{34}\\ h=\int_{-5}^{-\frac{13}{17}}\sqrt{1+(-\frac{5}{3})^2}dx=\sqrt{34}\\$$ This gives the area of the triangle $$A=\frac{1}{2}bh=24$$
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top