How Can You Prove the Angle XCB is 90 Degrees in a Parallelogram?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ngkamsengpeter
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Geometric
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves proving that angle XCB is 90 degrees in a parallelogram ABCD, where BA is extended to point X such that BA equals AX. The subject area pertains to properties of parallelograms and angles in geometry.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the validity of the original proposition, with some suggesting that it may not hold true in general cases. There are mentions of drawing diagrams to explore the conditions under which angle XCB could be 90 degrees.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring different interpretations of the problem. Some have provided counterexamples and highlighted specific cases where the angle could be right, while others emphasize that the original statement lacks general validity.

Contextual Notes

There is a focus on the specific conditions of the parallelogram and the angles involved, with references to rhombuses and the implications of internal angles on the outcome. The discussion acknowledges that the original problem does not specify limits on dimensions or angles.

ngkamsengpeter
Messages
193
Reaction score
0
Please help me to solve the following question :
ABCD is a parallelogram .BA is procude to X and BA=AX . Prove that angle of XCB is 90 degree.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In general, no help is given unless you show some work first. But in this case, the problem looks wrong - the proposition you're required to prove doesn't even seem to be true in general. Draw a diagram and show some work first, then we can help you.
 
ngkamsengpeter said:
Please help me to solve the following question :
ABCD is a parallelogram .BA is procude to X and BA=AX . Prove that angle of XCB is 90 degree.

I assume that by "procude" you mean to extend the line BA out to X.

You can't prove this- it isn't true.

Easy counterexample: Let ABCD be a square (which is a kind parallelgram). Let s be the common length of the sides. Extending BA to X such that the length of AB is equal to the length of AX means that the length of BX is 2s. Drawing the line segement CX gives a right triangle with legs of length s and 2s. The measure of the angle XCB is given by
tan(XCB)= 2s/s= 2. Since that is finite, XCB is not a right triangle. (Or, more simply, XCB is an angle in a right triangle with right angle at B. A triangle cannot have two right angles!)
 
HallsofIvy said:
You can't prove this- it isn't true.

Easy counterexample: Let ABCD be a square (which is a kind parallelgram). Let s be the common length of the sides. Extending BA to X such that the length of AB is equal to the length of AX means that the length of BX is 2s. Drawing the line segement CX gives a right triangle with legs of length s and 2s. The measure of the angle XCB is given by
tan(XCB)= 2s/s= 2. Since that is finite, XCB is not a right triangle. (Or, more simply, XCB is an angle in a right triangle with right angle at B. A triangle cannot have two right angles!)
But I draw it and it show it really 90 degree .See the diagram below :
 

Attachments

  • rhombus.jpg
    rhombus.jpg
    4.4 KB · Views: 496
Last edited by a moderator:
That has nothing to do with the problem you initially stated. Yes, it is possible to draw a parallelogram such that the angle XCB is a right angle.
However, the problem, as you initially stated it was
ABCD is a parallelogram .BA is procude to X and BA=AX . Prove that angle of XCB is 90 degree.

And that, in general, is not true.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I can't even see the diagram.
 
You didn't miss anything. It was a parallelogram (a rhombus, actually) carefully drawn to give the special case where the angle IS a right angle.
 
HallsofIvy said:
You didn't miss anything. It was a parallelogram (a rhombus, actually) carefully drawn to give the special case where the angle IS a right angle.
But can I prove ?
 
ngkamsengpeter said:
But can I prove ?

There's nothing to prove if the proposition is false.
 
  • #10
Curious3141 said:
There's nothing to prove if the proposition is false.
What do you mean by the proposition is false since the diagram show that the angle is really 90 degree.
 
  • #11
ngkamsengpeter said:
What do you mean by the proposition is false since the diagram show that the angle is really 90 degree.

Certainly if your parallelogram is a rhombus with internal angles of 60 and 120 degrees, angle XCB is 90 degrees. That's the diagram you drew,

But it isn't true in general! Nowhere in the original question were limits placed on the dimensions or internal angles of the parallelogram. In all the infinite number of possible cases where the conditions of the question are met, most of them will have angle XCB NOT equal to 90 degrees.

Do you see ?
 
  • #12
Curious3141 said:
Certainly if your parallelogram is a rhombus with internal angles of 60 and 120 degrees, angle XCB is 90 degrees. That's the diagram you drew,

But it isn't true in general! Nowhere in the original question were limits placed on the dimensions or internal angles of the parallelogram. In all the infinite number of possible cases where the conditions of the question are met, most of them will have angle XCB NOT equal to 90 degrees.

Do you see ?
That means that the angle is 90 degree only when the internal angle is 60 or 120 degree right ?
 
  • #13
ngkamsengpeter said:
That means that the angle is 90 degree only when the internal angle is 60 or 120 degree right ?

For a rhombus, it only works if you draw it exactly like you did. If ABC is the 120 degree angle instead it doesn't work.

You don't necessarily need a rhombus. It works in some parallelograms too.

In parallelogram ABCD, the length BA = CD = l (length) and AD = BC = w (width) (as you drew it, except in your diagram, you drew a rhombus where l = w).

Angle BCX is only 90 degrees if angle ABC = theta satisfies [tex]\cos\theta = \frac{w}{2l}[/tex]
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K