How Can You Simplify a 3x3 Matrix Determinant with Variables a and b?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Koranzite
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Determinant Matrix
Click For Summary
To simplify a 3x3 matrix determinant with variables a and b, the goal is to achieve a row echelon form with linear diagonal elements. Initial attempts involved row operations that resulted in cubic terms, complicating the factorization. A successful approach included evaluating the determinant for specific values of a (0 and 1) and factoring the resulting polynomial in b. This method revealed consistent factors across different values of a, allowing for the identification of linear relationships. Ultimately, this led to the desired linear factorization of the determinant.
Koranzite
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I've attached the problem, it involves reducing a 3x3 matrix determinant to row echelon form, but the leading diagonal elements have to be linear in a and b afterwards.

Homework Equations




The Attempt at a Solution



I've managed to convert it to row echelon form by: r3-ar2 ; r2-ar1 ; r3-br2
The problem is that this leaves a diagonal element having cubic terms. Can anyone see a way to acomplish this? Should be an easy problem, but I've spent over an hour trying different combinations.
 

Attachments

  • matrix question.PNG
    matrix question.PNG
    6.3 KB · Views: 450
Physics news on Phys.org
I recommend just computing the determinant and doing some simple algebra to factor the resulting expression.
 
AKG said:
I recommend just computing the determinant and doing some simple algebra to factor the resulting expression.

I also tried that, to no avail.
 
Koranzite said:
I also tried that, to no avail.

The factorization is not immediately obvious, but what finally worked for me was to look at the determinant for two different numerical values of a (namely, a = 0 and a = 1) and in each case to factor the resulting polynomial in b. Some factors are the same for both values of a, and some others differ in such a way that you can easily figure out what they are as functions of a. You end up with a factorization exactly of the required type.

RGV
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K