How close can 2 coherent photons be?

  • Thread starter Thread starter bwana
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Coherent Photons
AI Thread Summary
Coherent photons, such as those emitted from lasers, can theoretically be no closer than the size of the atom that emitted them, which is around 64 picometers for adjacent helium atoms. However, the actual distance between photons is influenced by their wavelength, which is significantly larger than the atomic scale. Measuring the separation of photons poses challenges, as it requires sensors with precision beyond the wavelength of light. Techniques like interferometry can be used to assess mutual coherence and measure the distance between photons through interference patterns. The discussion highlights the complexity of photon behavior and the limitations of current measurement technologies.
bwana
Messages
82
Reaction score
2
By coherent photons, I mean ones that are in phase (like what comes out of a laser). I would guess that they can be no closer than the size of the atom that emitted them. If adjacent atoms simultaneously emitted photons, that would give the minimum separation. For the photons to be any closer, the atoms would have to be staggered. But then they would be offset in the direction of light travel and result in phase differences.

Is there a way to measure this? It would require sensors more closely packed than the wavelength. I was reading that only recently have metamaterials been developed where patterns can be inscribed in metal smaller than a wavelength.
 
Science news on Phys.org
Well, I do not have an answer, but I understand your question and consider it a good one for general purposes.
 
bwana said:
By coherent photons, I mean ones that are in phase (like what comes out of a laser). I would guess that they can be no closer than the size of the atom that emitted them. If adjacent atoms simultaneously emitted photons, that would give the minimum separation. For the photons to be any closer, the atoms would have to be staggered. But then they would be offset in the direction of light travel and result in phase differences.

Is there a way to measure this? It would require sensors more closely packed than the wavelength. I was reading that only recently have metamaterials been developed where patterns can be inscribed in metal smaller than a wavelength.

Photons don't really have a size. However, it's possible to write down the mutual coherence between two photons that vary slightly in frequency, direction of propagation, or both.

The mutual coherence function \Gamma is a statistical property of the system, but can be written down as something like:

\Gamma =\frac{<E(r,t)E^{*}(r+s, t+ \tau)>}{<I(0,0)>}.

http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/physics/MutualCoherenceFunction.html

For some situations (two fully coherent sources, two mutually incoherent sources), the MCF is easy to evaluate. In general, the form can be found by the vanCittert-Zernicke theorem.

If two photons differ *slightly* from each other, the MCF is approximately of the form sin(x)/x: a sinc function. So the mutual coherence will decrease as the properties differ, but becoming zero only at specific points in parameter space. The MCF can be measured easily enough (interferometric telescopes require this information) with a Young's interferometer and/or a Michaelson interferometer.

My reference text is Mandel and Wolf's book, but it's in my office. If I think of it, I'll follow-up this post.
 
thank you for your considered replies. however, by size i should have more specifically stated wavelength. For example, the radius of a helium atom is 32 pm (=.032 nm, =.000032 microns) However the wavelength of light generated by Helium Neon Gas Laser is much larger.
Specifically, the transition from upper 3s to 3p and 3s to 3p levels generate the laser of wavelengths 6328*10^-10 m (red color) and 3.39 microns respectively,Transition from 2s to 2p level generate laser beam of wavelength 1.15 microns.

My naive statement then is that the distance between photons (emitted in phase from adjacent helium atoms) should be 64 pm. However, the wavelength of the light emitted is much greater. How far apart are photons REALLY? Can this be measured to a greater precision than the wavelength of the light ?

For example, Could the distance separating photons be measured by looking at the interference caused by shining a second identical laser onto the spot of the first laser? As one laser is slowly moved from left to right, the intensity of the spot where the two beams are coincident should fluctuate as interference changes from constructive to destructive. The distance the laser has to be moved to go from maximum to minimum intensity should be the distance separating the photons.

Perhaps this question has already been asked/answered more intelligently but I cannot find it with commonly available search engines on the net.
 
bwana said:
My naive statement then is that the distance between photons (emitted in phase from adjacent helium atoms) should be 64 pm. However, the wavelength of the light emitted is much greater. How far apart are photons REALLY? Can this be measured to a greater precision than the wavelength of the light ?

I don't understand what you are asking. It is true that the wavelength of emitted light is often much larger than the object emitting the light. But 'size' is not a physical property of photons.

bwana said:
For example, Could the distance separating photons be measured by looking at the interference caused by shining a second identical laser onto the spot of the first laser?

Yes- this is called measuring the mutual coherence of the sources. If the lasers are independent, the sources are mutually incoherent. The vanCittert-Zernicke theorem shows that as the light propagates, the mutual coherence changes, giving rise to a spatially correlated field:

http://www.ncra.tifr.res.in/gmrt_hpage/Users/doc/WEBLF/LFRA/node19.html

http://spiedl.aip.org/getabs/servlet/GetabsServlet?prog=normal&id=PSISDG002525000001000148000001&idtype=cvips&gifs=yes&ref=no
 
Last edited by a moderator:
thanks again.
 
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...
Back
Top