How Cold/Hot Temps Affect Processor Performance

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around how temperature affects processor performance, specifically whether processors run faster in cold conditions and slower in hot conditions. Participants explore the implications of temperature on resistance, heat dissipation, overclocking, and stability of processors.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that resistance in semiconductors decreases with temperature, which could imply faster performance, but questions this assumption.
  • Another participant asserts that processors do not inherently run faster when cooled; rather, they can perform better if adjustments are made to motherboard settings.
  • It is noted that inadequate cooling can lead to increased internal resistance and potential errors, particularly when overclocking.
  • Participants discuss the cumulative effect of overclocking, where increased voltage leads to higher temperatures, necessitating better cooling solutions.
  • One participant mentions that while cooling a stock CPU won't enhance performance, overclocking can lead to instability if temperatures rise too high.
  • There is a reference to older processors that were sold underclocked, suggesting that modifying parameters can lead to increased performance under certain conditions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally disagree on whether processors run faster under cold conditions without adjustments. There are multiple competing views regarding the relationship between temperature, performance, and the need for cooling solutions.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the effects of temperature on performance, particularly regarding the conditions under which processors can be overclocked and the implications of heat on stability.

Ed Aboud
Messages
200
Reaction score
0
How come processors run faster under cold conditions and slower under hot conditions?
I always assumed resitance would play an important part in this and if a processor is made up of some type of semiconductor then resistance would decrease with temperature thus allowing more current to flow and therefore the processor would be faster. But this doesn't seem to be the case.
 
Computer science news on Phys.org
Ed Aboud said:
How come processors run faster under cold conditions and slower under hot conditions?
They don't, where did you hear that?

Processors can be run faster if they are kept colder because they are able to dissipate heat better. But they don't just start running faster when cooled, you need to adjust the settings of the motherboard to make them run faster.
 
Oh ok, a teacher in my school.

That makes sense, thanks very much.
 
russ_watters said:
They don't, where did you hear that?

Processors can be run faster if they are kept colder because they are able to dissipate heat better. But they don't just start running faster when cooled, you need to adjust the settings of the motherboard to make them run faster.

Russ is dead on. If a cooling solution for even a stock-speed processor is inadequate, heat can build up which causes an increase in internal resistance and therefore, errors to potentially form.

When people start overclocking processors, an increase in voltage is required to maintain stability. That increase in supplied voltage causes an increase in temperature... which then requires a further increase in cooling. As you overclock more and more, it builds into a cumulative effect... where say, five times the cooling is required for just a 30 to 35% overclock. That's when people start playing with solutions like refrigeration and liquid nitrogen.
 
russ_watters said:
They don't, where did you hear that?

Processors can be run faster if they are kept colder because they are able to dissipate heat better. But they don't just start running faster when cooled, you need to adjust the settings of the motherboard to make them run faster.

Russ is dead on. If a cooling solution for even a stock-speed processor is inadequate, heat can build up which causes an increase in internal resistance and therefore, errors to potentially form.

When people start overclocking processors, an increase in voltage is required to maintain stability. That increase in supplied voltage causes an increase in temperature... which then requires a further increase in cooling. As you overclock more and more, it builds into a cumulative effect... where say, five times the cooling is required for just a 30 to 35% overclock. Push it even more, and that's when people start playing with solutions like refrigeration and liquid nitrogen.
 
B. Elliott is right.

Processors will not "become faster" by lowering the temperature, but depending on the processor you have, you COULD modify the parameters of the CPU (front-side bus, multiplier, voltage...) so it performs faster than it should (if anyone remembers the old celeron FCPGA processors, Intel used to just sell underclocked CPUs).

The side-effect is the extra heat, which is why the more you overclock the processor, the better the cooling solution must be in order to provide stability.

Cooling down a stock CPU won't do anything though. Heating it up however does do something, and that something is pretty much 'instability.' Some CPUs have the ability to underclock itself to remain stable in these situations, such as Pentium 4s. However, if the CPU gets way past its threshold, then the die will eventually turn to poop.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
5K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K