How come escape velocity isn't imaginary?

AI Thread Summary
Escape velocity is defined as the speed needed for an object to break free from a gravitational field without further propulsion. It is derived from the principle that at this velocity, the kinetic energy equals the negative of the gravitational potential energy. The equation shows that while potential energy is negative, kinetic energy remains positive, ensuring that escape velocity is a real, non-imaginary number. The discussion clarifies that at escape velocity, the total mechanical energy (kinetic plus potential) sums to zero. Understanding this relationship resolves the confusion regarding the nature of escape velocity.
Jules Winnfield
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
Going through several definitions, it appears that escape velocity is equal to the potential energy. That is:$$\frac{1}{2}m v^2=-\frac{G M m}{r}$$but if I solve for velocity, $v$, I get:$$v=\sqrt{-2\frac{G M}{r}}$$So how do I get an escape velocity that isn't imaginary?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's the velocity such that the kinetic energy at launch is equal to the potential energy difference between infinity and the point of launch. So$$\frac 12mv^2=0-\left(-\frac{GMm}r\right)$$
 
Jules Winnfield said:
Going through several definitions, it appears that escape velocity is equal to the potential energy.

No, at escape velocity the sum of kinetic and potential energy is zero.
 
Ibix said:
It's the velocity such that the kinetic energy at launch is equal to the potential energy difference between infinity and the point of launch. So$$\frac 12mv^2=0-\left(-\frac{GMm}r\right)$$
That makes sense. Thank you for the clarification.
 
DrStupid said:
No, at escape velocity the sum of kinetic and potential energy is zero.
And in this sum PE is always negative so KE is always positive.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Let there be a person in a not yet optimally designed sled at h meters in height. Let this sled free fall but user can steer by tilting their body weight in the sled or by optimal sled shape design point it in some horizontal direction where it is wanted to go - in any horizontal direction but once picked fixed. How to calculate horizontal distance d achievable as function of height h. Thus what is f(h) = d. Put another way, imagine a helicopter rises to a height h, but then shuts off all...
Back
Top