I am currently reading Young & Freedmans textbook on physics as part of a university course, and I've noticed that they repeatedly represent surface integrals (which are double integrals) as single integrals.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

For instance, they symbolically represent the magnetic flux through a surface as:

[tex]\int \vec{\textbf{B}} \cdot d\vec{\textbf{A}}[/tex]

However, I suspected that this should in fact be a double integral (since the domain of integration is a surface), and indeed on Wikipedia they write the magnetic flux through a surface as:

[tex]\iint\vec{\textbf{B}} \cdot d\vec{\textbf{A}}[/tex]

My question is, which representation is the right and why? Are they both right and we are supposed to implicitly understand that the single integral should be evaluated as a double integral since we have a surface area element?

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# I How come surface integrals are single integrals in my book?

Have something to add?

Draft saved
Draft deleted

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**