What is the purpose of a surface integral and how is it calculated?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept and calculation of surface integrals, exploring their purpose and applications in mathematics. Participants express confusion regarding the interpretation of surface integrals, particularly in relation to volume and area calculations, as well as their geometric implications.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses uncertainty about the meaning of a surface integral, noting that while they understand the mathematical formulation, they struggle with its conceptual interpretation, particularly in relation to volume.
  • Another participant provides a definition of surface integrals, suggesting that they involve integrating a function over a surface, similar to how regular integrals work over specified regions.
  • Some participants discuss the relationship between surface integrals and applications, such as calculating mass from a density function or total force from a pressure function over a surface.
  • There is confusion regarding the projection of surfaces onto planes and how this relates to the regions of integration for double integrals.
  • One participant emphasizes that the integral itself does not inherently represent area or volume but can have specific applications that do.
  • Another participant suggests a method for reducing surface integrals to single integrals by considering the projection of surfaces and dependent limits of integration.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the mathematical formulation of surface integrals but express differing views on their conceptual meaning and applications. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the specific interpretation of what a surface integral represents.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the need for clarity on the definitions and applications of surface integrals, as well as the geometric interpretations involved. There are unresolved questions about the relationship between surface integrals and other types of integrals, such as line integrals.

B3NR4Y
Gold Member
Messages
170
Reaction score
1
I'm beyond multi-variable calculus, where this is taught, but I still don't know what the hell a surface integral is. I understand that d\sigma is the surface element, and | \frac{\partial \vec{r}}{\partial u}du \times \frac{\partial \vec{r}}{\partial v}dv | = d\sigma = |\frac{\partial \vec{r}}{\partial u} \times \frac{\partial \vec{r}}{\partial v} | \, dudv, and that cross product is equal to the area of the infinitesimally small parallelogram described by the two vectors, so summing across all of that (with double integrals yields a surface area). But when you have a function in there like this \iint_\Sigma f d\sigma I don't know what the heck this is supposed to represent. My intuition tells me it's a volume, because it's a function (height) times an area, but I don't think that's right.

I know (or think I know) a line integral of the form \int_C f ds is equivalent to the area under the function traced by the curve C. So the natural extension of this should be a surface integral equaling a volume.

Basically I know how to calculate surface integrals, but I don't know what in the world I'm calculating.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jedishrfu said:
I've read that before, but I have just read it again. So a regular integral is integrating a function over a region that you specify with the limits, a surface integral is integrating a function over a surface. So like a triple integral of a density function is the mass of the solid, a surface integral would yield mass if you had a density function per unit area. So flux being the dot product of the vector field and the normal vector of the surface, you sum over the entire surface which is a surface integral, right?

I guess what confuses me is the common picture showing the projection of the surface onto the plane, where does this come in? The projection is the region you integrate over for the double integral? Also, how do I conceptualize something like \iint_{\Sigma} z d\sigma where the surface is the upper half of a sphere of radius 2? I'm summing all the z's across the surface? This is confusing to me.
 
I am not sure if you are asking about a "surface integral" itself or about applications of a surface integral. The surface integral itself is just the integral of some function that takes on a given value at each point on the surface, just as the "ordinary" Calculus I integral is a an integral of a function that takes on values at every point from x= a to x= b. The integral being an "area" or the line integral being "the area under the function traced by the curve C" are specific applications, not the meanings of the integrals themselves. For example, a line integral might well be the work done by a given force moving an object along that curve. One possible application of a surface integral is that the integral of a "pressure" function over a surface is the total force on that surface.
 
HallsofIvy said:
I am not sure if you are asking about a "surface integral" itself or about applications of a surface integral. The surface integral itself is just the integral of some function that takes on a given value at each point on the surface, just as the "ordinary" Calculus I integral is a an integral of a function that takes on values at every point from x= a to x= b. The integral being an "area" or the line integral being "the area under the function traced by the curve C" are specific applications, not the meanings of the integrals themselves. For example, a line integral might well be the work done by a given force moving an object along that curve. One possible application of a surface integral is that the integral of a "pressure" function over a surface is the total force on that surface.
I think I understand now, but they only thing I don't understand is what \iint_\Sigma f \, \, d\sigma represents. I know that \int_C f \, \, ds represents the area under the curve C on f, so what does the surface integral represent?
 
B3NR4Y said:
I think I understand now, but they only thing I don't understand is what \iint_\Sigma f \, \, d\sigma represents. I know that \int_C f \, \, ds represents the area under the curve C on f, so what does the surface integral represent?
And what I said was that \int_C f ds does NOT 'represent' the area under the curve. That is one possible application of the integral, not what the integral is or "represents".
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The basic idea behind these volume and surface integrals is to reduce it down to a single integral.

So if you have a surface integral z=f(x,y) for a surface that projects a circle in the xy plane then you'd integrate over say y first and then evaluate using the y limits.

Notice the y limits are dependent on x so the resultant expression become the integrand of an integral over x.

Integrating that integral with respect to x and applying the x limits produces your answer.

Sometimes you'll have some extra steps where you'll have to do extra steps or recognize some symmetry to get the complete answer.

As a simple example, find the area of a circle in xy coordinates will get you half the circle as apply the x limits of -r to +r and then you have to do it for the other half or note the symmetry of the half circles.

I hope that wasn't too confusing.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K