How constant acceleration affects the tripulation of a spaceship?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

A spacecraft accelerating at a constant rate of 1g (10 m/s²) exerts a gravitational-like force on its crew, pushing them towards the back of the ship. This phenomenon is explained by Einstein's equivalence principle, which states that constant acceleration is indistinguishable from gravitational force. Therefore, the crew would not experience weightlessness but rather a force equivalent to Earth's gravity. Understanding these principles is crucial for planning long-duration manned space missions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Einstein's equivalence principle
  • Basic knowledge of physics concepts such as acceleration and gravity
  • Familiarity with the effects of acceleration on the human body
  • Awareness of spacecraft design considerations for long-duration missions
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of constant acceleration on human physiology during space travel
  • Explore spacecraft design strategies for mitigating acceleration effects
  • Learn about the engineering challenges of interstellar travel
  • Investigate current technologies for sustaining life during long-duration space missions
USEFUL FOR

Aerospace engineers, physicists, space mission planners, and anyone interested in the effects of acceleration on human crews during space travel.

MonkeyKid
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
I appologize for any spelling or grammar errors. Please take into account that English isn't my first language and that I haven't finished my English course yet, since I'm 14 years old.

My Question (which I suppose is very dumb): Imagine there is a manned spacecraft traveling through deep space accelerating at a constant rate of 1g (10 m/s²). Would the tripulation feel a constant pull towards the back of the ship equivalent to gravity on Earth? Or would they float weightlessly? Why?

I'm thinking about interstellar travel and I thought that maybe accelerating beyond 1g would be harmful, because the tripulation would experience a strong gravity-like force pulling them towards one end of the ship (the back end, in case the vehicle was accelerating, or the front end, in case it was decelerating).

The answer and the explanation are probably very obvious, so thanks in advance for anyone taking their time to answer this.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't know what "tripulation" means, and a search of the dictionary turned up nothing. However, I assume you are asking whether passengers, whether people or objects, would be weightless or not. The answer is that they would not be weightless. They would be pushed into the back of the ship with an acceleration of about 9.8 m/s2, or 1g.
 
About one hundred years ago Einstein formulated his "equivalence principle". It states that gravity is the same as constant acceleration. So in a ship accelerating at 1 g toward its front, its passengers and objects would feel gravity as if the ship were standing on the Earth its front pointing upward.
 
Drakkith said:
I don't know what "tripulation" means, and a search of the dictionary turned up nothing. However, I assume you are asking whether passengers, whether people or objects, would be weightless or not. The answer is that they would not be weightless. They would be pushed into the back of the ship with an acceleration of about 9.8 m/s2, or 1g.

S(he) meant to say the crew of the ship. The OP's first language is probably either Spanish or Portuguese. The word for crew in Spanish, for instance, is tripulación. In Portuguese it is tripulação.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Sten Larsen and Delta2
dauto said:
S(he) meant to say the crew of the ship. The OP's first language is probably either Spanish or Portuguese. The word for crew in Spanish, for instance, is tripulación. In Portuguese it is tripulação.

That's exactly what I meant. My first language is indeed Portuguese.

Thank you all for your answers, the subject is now clear to me. In long manned space trips to distant stars, we are then not only limited in terms of highest speed achievable but also in the highest acceleration tolerable by the human crew.
 
I like the way you rationalize kid! keep thinking
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
15K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
750
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
919
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
9K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
22K