How dense is a virus/virion in relation to water?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Aero51
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Density
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The density of individual virus particles, or virions, is approximately 1.03 g/ml (1030 kg/m³), which is nearly equal to the density of water. This density allows viruses to remain airborne when aerosolized in small water droplets, despite their small size. In fluid dynamics applications, buoyancy and gravity are negligible for such particles, making Brownian motion a significant factor in their behavior. Density gradient centrifugation is a common method for purifying viruses, as demonstrated in a referenced study on hepatitis C virus density.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of fluid dynamics principles, particularly laminar flow.
  • Familiarity with Brownian motion and its effects on small particles.
  • Knowledge of density gradient centrifugation techniques.
  • Basic concepts of particle tracking in fluids.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research "density gradient centrifugation protocols" for virus purification.
  • Study "Brownian motion effects on particle behavior in fluids."
  • Explore "laminar flow modeling in narrow tubes" for filtration systems.
  • Investigate "Saffman lift force" and its implications in particle dynamics.
USEFUL FOR

Students in fluid dynamics, researchers in virology, and professionals involved in filtration system design will benefit from this discussion.

Aero51
Messages
545
Reaction score
10
I am doing a project for my fluids class pertaining to particle tracking. As a sample application, I would like to simulate a virus traveling through a filter or (most simply) a very narrow tube in laminar flow conditions. I need the density of an individual virus particle (a virion as Wikipedia says) to resolve the buoyant forces. Right now I have found very low density viruses to be about 1.03 g/ml or about 1030 kg/m^3 (just under the density of water). I have no physical intuition, but that number seems very large for a virus. I would think if their density was almost as high as water that there would be no such thing as an "airborne virus" simply because it would sink to the ground. Does anyone have a good reference?
 
Biology news on Phys.org
The density of water is a good approximation for all cells and cell-like structures, usually water is the main component.

Virus particles are so small that buoyancy (and gravity in general) is negligible in realistic setups - sure, if your air is perfectly motionless, on average the particle will sink, but if that happens on a timescale of hours (or even longer) you can neglect it. Brownian motion is relevant for those particles, too.
 
Viruses have about the same density as water. They can be airborne when they become aerosolized small water droplets.

A typical way to purify viruses is by density gradient centrifugation. Essentially, you set up a gradient in centrifuge tube with a high concentration of a salt or sugar solution at the bottom of the tube and a lower concentration on top. You then add the virus in and centrifuge overnight so that the virus migrates to where it's density matches the density of the surrounding solution. Here's a paper that estimates the density of hepatitis C virus using this method and also discusses the density of other viruses: http://vir.sgmjournals.org/content/73/3/715.full.pdf
 
Thank you for the information. According to my calculations the Brownian motion is generally small, but may not be negligible. For instance, I would like to model a filtration system. We have a fully developed laminar flow in a tube of a diameter D. What diameter would be required to say, stop 90% of virions traveling through a filter channel of 100 microns in length? I am not planning on including the wall attraction just yet, but I have included the drag forces, buoyant forces and the Saffman lift force. The Brownian motion of the particle will help enhance the catching frequency. If this is not a good application, what would you suggest?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
31
Views
4K