How did Gibbs come up with the idea that particles are indistinguishable?

kof9595995
Messages
676
Reaction score
2
To resolve Gibbs paradox, Gibbs himself came up the idea to treat particles as indistinguishable. Since by then QM hadn't been discovered, how did Gibbs argue that particles indistinguishable? In any classical sense, particles should be distinguishable, if Gibbs did it only to resolve the paradox, wouldn't it be ad hoc?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
kof9595995 said:
To resolve Gibbs paradox, Gibbs himself came up the idea to treat particles as indistinguishable. Since by then QM hadn't been discovered, how did Gibbs argue that particles indistinguishable? In any classical sense, particles should be distinguishable, if Gibbs did it only to resolve the paradox, wouldn't it be ad hoc?

The discretization of energy was an ad hoc act of desperation and mathematical manipulation on Planck's part to resolve the "ultarviolet catastrophe". It led to QM.

So what's wrong with the ad hoc approach?
 
kof9595995 said:
How did Gibbs come up with the idea that particles are indistinguishable?

Creativity :smile:
 
Pythagorean said:
The discretization of energy was an ad hoc act of desperation and mathematical manipulation on Planck's part to resolve the "ultarviolet catastrophe". It led to QM.

So what's wrong with the ad hoc approach?

That makes sense, but it seems that this idea didn't cause enough attention and debates than it deserved.
 
I think the main reason for the lack of attention was that Gibbs published in an obscure journal in Connecticut, and most of his insights became clearer after other people had independently reproduced his results.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top