How did I miss this easy derivative question on my calc 2 exam?

  • Thread starter Thread starter octahedron
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Stupid
AI Thread Summary
In a recent discussion about a challenging calculus exam, participants shared experiences of making mistakes, particularly in derivative questions, which can significantly impact grades. One user expressed frustration over missing a grade-boosting derivative question while focusing on tougher integrals, leading to a drop in their usual high scores. They reflected on a specific problem involving the derivative of a function with a logarithmic exponent, admitting to misapplying the power rule instead of properly utilizing the chain rule. Others chimed in with similar experiences, emphasizing that everyone makes mistakes and suggesting strategies for managing exam anxiety, such as skipping difficult questions initially to build confidence. The conversation highlighted the common struggle with complex calculus concepts and the importance of effective test-taking strategies.
octahedron
Messages
37
Reaction score
0
So in a calc 2 exam, you gloss over all the derivatives questions and get to integration and series. You get the really tough integrals, but you miss the grade-boosting derivative question (10%/100)?! So I've never gotten lower than 95% on a math midterm, but now I'm getting 85%~. Look at how stupid I was when I saw this question:

Find y' of (x^{2} + 3x)^{ln(x)}. If I told you I used power rule, how'd that bode for me as a math major?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Art is a nice major :smile: - not meant to denigrate Art...
 
That's not an easy derivative. Should of used the chain rule first though, then it looks like some sort of product, I had a quick go, but I think it might take a while. And anyway quit beating yourself up everyone makes mistakes. :smile:
 
Oh, I used the chain rule along with the power rule. My point was that I treated ln(x) as a constant by somehow overlooking the x in ln, ha ha. Definitely looking at art history for a change.
 
Last edited:
octahedron said:
Oh, I used the chain rule along with the power rule. My point was that I treated ln(x) as a constant by somehow overlooking the x in ln, ha ha. Definitely looking at art history for a change.

Hehe, yeah that's pretty dumb, but nobody's perfect. :smile:

The power rule is the chain rule for powers, I got what you meant.

Oh by the way x is not a constant. :-p
 
x is a constant pain in the ass. I'm always having to solve for x. Why can't x solve for itself?
 
octahedron said:
So in a calc 2 exam, you gloss over all the derivatives questions and get to integration and series. You get the really tough integrals, but you miss the grade-boosting derivative question (10%/100)?! So I've never gotten lower than 95% on a math midterm, but now I'm getting 85%~. Look at how stupid I was when I saw this question:

Find y' of (x^{2} + 3x)^{ln(x)}. If I told you I used power rule, how'd that bode for me as a math major?
Don't take it so hard. In cases like this, I have just worked out the problem and shown it to the teacher so that the teacher realizes I know how to work the problem. I'm sure I've made exactly the same mistake with regard to a variable exponent.

Sometimes one has to think in terms of f(x)g(x).
 
Astronuc said:
Sometimes one has to think in terms of f(x)g(x).

Then one just has to remember that

<br /> f(x)^{g(x)} = \exp(g(x)\ln(f(x)))<br />
 
sometimes, one of the techniques which I utliize whenever I take exams is this:

Skip over any questions which you have to think for more than about 1-2 mins. This ensures that you do not spend needless time over questions that you MAY not be able to solve. Instread, when you get back to these questions, you should have plenty of time to solve them and this psychological advantage will help you calm your nerves whereas if you were to solve the question head on, you will get more nervous as you feel that you are running out of time and spending too much time on one question.
 
  • #10
My anxiety levels in exams were terrible (as they are everywhere). I used to go in rush as much as I could in the 30 minutes and then run away :smile:. I'm amazed I passed anything.
 
Last edited:
  • #11
Oerg said:
sometimes, one of the techniques which I utliize whenever I take exams is this:

Skip over any questions which you have to think for more than about 1-2 mins. This ensures that you do not spend needless time over questions that you MAY not be able to solve. Instread, when you get back to these questions, you should have plenty of time to solve them and this psychological advantage will help you calm your nerves whereas if you were to solve the question head on, you will get more nervous as you feel that you are running out of time and spending too much time on one question.

Excellent test strategy. It's a confidence booster to get two or three easy problems done, then you can relax and concentrate on the rest of the exam.
 
  • #12
Oerg said:
Skip over any questions which you have to think for more than about 1-2 mins. .

I did that to my electormagnetism exam. I ended up just skipping all problems, and just started over again...
 
  • #13
tkjacobsen said:
I did that to my electormagnetism exam. I ended up just skipping all problems, and just started over again...

:smile:
 
  • #14
Laugh if you will, I did the exact same thing on more than one occasion.

Last test, there were only 3 problems.
 
  • #15
Oh I remember those days very clearly. There aren't any "gimmees" on upper division E&M exams!
 
  • #16
Kurdt said:
x is a constant pain in the ass. I'm always having to solve for x. Why can't x solve for itself?
Yeah, what a useless variable. It should start pulling its own weight and solving some of its own problems. :rolleyes:

tkjacobsen said:
I did that to my electormagnetism exam. I ended up just skipping all problems, and just started over again...

:smile: Indeed, that advice only works up to a certain level. When you get 6 questions and 4 hours for an exam, skipping the hard questions while looking for some you can quickly complete in 1-2 min isn't a very effective strategy anymore. :biggrin:

octahedron, there's no point beating yourself up over it. Everyone has made a fatal exam mistake that lost them a lot of points for reading carelessly at sometime in their life.
 
  • #17
I'm definitely not beating myself over this again. :p
Oerg said:
Skip over any questions which you have to think for more than about 1-2 mins.

I did that in my physics midterm (baby E&M), and it served me well. Somehow during my math midterms I get too excited for my own good and decide to get to the "real" questions quickly and skip all the fluff (the derivatives -- two of them, and accounting for 20% -- were fluff, but I somehow regret not second guessing myself on the second one -- it seemed over too quickly).

tkjacobsen said:
I did that to my electormagnetism exam. I ended up just skipping all problems, and just started over again...

Heh. Sorry about that.

Kurdt said:
x is a constant pain in the ass. I'm always having to solve for x. Why can't x solve for itself?

I know, right? Found the pun funny, ha ha.
 
Last edited:
  • #18
octahedron said:
Heh. Sorry about that.

Don't be, I got an A :smile:
 
Back
Top