How did Madhava come up with the Arctan series?

  • Thread starter Thread starter imurme8
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Series
AI Thread Summary
Madhava's discovery of the arctangent power series is questioned regarding the methods he used, as he likely lacked formal concepts like the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus or uniform convergence. The discussion suggests that Indian mathematicians may have understood infinite geometric series and their connection to trigonometric functions, which could have influenced Madhava's work. There is a recognition that much of Indian mathematics lacks detailed explanations, often presenting results without accompanying reasoning. Some insights into Madhava's methods are noted to be found in writings by his followers. Overall, the conversation highlights the mystery surrounding the origins of Madhava's mathematical contributions.
imurme8
Messages
45
Reaction score
0
Does anyone know how Madhava discovered the power series for the arctangent? I think the standard way is to note that 1-x^2+x^4-\dotsb converges uniformly on (-1,1) to \frac{d}{dt}\tan^{-1}x, and thus applying the fundamental theorem of calculus we may integrate term-by-term. But how did Madhava do it? I don't know that he had the FTOC or a concept of uniform convergence, or even that he knew how to integrate a polynomial.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
obviously it was revealed by vishnu.
 
mathwonk said:
obviously it was revealed by vishnu.

That made me laugh.
 
The problem with much of Indian mathematics is that it is in the form: "See!", with no attendant explanations.
Presumably, such explanations were developed in the local schools and research centres, but we have not, unfortunately, been handed down lecture notes and such from those days.

If I were to make a guess, I would think they were well aware of the sum of an infinite geometric series, and that the result given has a close relationship to their understanding of how 1/(1+x^2) appeared within trigonometry.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
For original Zeta function, ζ(s)=1+1/2^s+1/3^s+1/4^s+... =1+e^(-sln2)+e^(-sln3)+e^(-sln4)+... , Re(s)>1 If we regards it as some function got from Laplace transformation, and let this real function be ζ(x), that means L[ζ(x)]=ζ(s), then: ζ(x)=L^-1[ζ(s)]=δ(x)+δ(x-ln2)+δ(x-ln3)+δ(x-ln4)+... , this represents a series of Dirac delta functions at the points of x=0, ln2, ln3, ln4, ... , It may be still difficult to understand what ζ(x) means, but once it is integrated, the truth is clear...
Back
Top