How Do Bloch Wavefunctions Constrain Real-Valued Potentials?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter hilbert2
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Wavefunctions
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the constraints of Bloch wavefunctions in relation to real-valued potentials in quantum mechanics. Participants explore the implications of Bloch's theorem, the nature of periodic potentials, and the conditions under which the wavefunctions can be real or complex. The scope includes theoretical considerations and mathematical reasoning related to the Schrödinger equation and wavefunction properties.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant outlines the relationship between Bloch wavefunctions and periodic potentials, suggesting that real-valued potentials require trivial constant functions for the periodic part of the wavefunction.
  • Another participant proposes a complex form for the periodic function and derives conditions for the potential to remain real, leading to a nonlinear ordinary differential equation for specific cases.
  • A different participant discusses the role of the pseudomomentum k, noting that non-zero k values correspond to traveling wave solutions, which necessitate complex wavefunctions.
  • One participant challenges the assumption that the periodic function must be complex, seeking a simple example of a periodic function that corresponds to a real-valued potential.
  • Another participant acknowledges the difficulty in finding simple solutions to the Bloch equation, suggesting that while some potentials may yield real functions at specific k values, this does not represent a general case in solid-state physics.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the necessity of complex wavefunctions for non-stationary states and the existence of simple examples of periodic functions that yield real potentials. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the conditions under which real-valued potentials can be achieved with non-trivial wavefunctions.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the complexity of the derived equations and the dependence on specific forms of the periodic function. The discussion highlights the challenges in finding explicit examples that satisfy all desired conditions.

hilbert2
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
1,611
Reaction score
611
Consider an electron in a periodic potential V(x) such that V(x+a) = V(x) for some real number a. The energy eigenstates are obtained from time-independent SE, which in atomic units is
-\frac{1}{2}\frac{\partial^{2}\psi(x)}{\partial x^{2}}+V(x)\psi(x)=E\psi(x)

According to Bloch theorem, the energy eigenstates are of form \psi(x)=exp(ikx)\phi(x)
where \phi(x) has the same periodicity as V(x).

If at least one eigenfunction is known, the potential V(x) can be solved from the SE with an inverse formula:

V(x)=\frac{\psi''(x)}{2\psi(x)}

Here the eigenvalue E has been arbitrarily chosen to be zero (changing its value only corresponds to adding a constant term to V(x). Plugging the expression for Bloch wavefunction in this equation and differentiating, we get

V(x)=-k^{2}+ik\frac{\phi'(x)}{\phi(x)}+\frac{\phi''(x)}{2\phi(x)}

From this equation one can easily see that the only way how a real-valued \phi(x) can correspond to a real-valued potential V(x) is that \phi(x) is the trivial constant function. Therefore, in most Bloch wavefunctions that correspond to a physically possible potential, \phi(x) is a complex-valued function.

Questions: Why is the range of physically possible Bloch wavefunctions so limited? What's the simplest way to express the minimal condition for function \phi(x) that guarantees real-valued V(x) ? Can anyone give even one nontrivial example of a (differentiable) Bloch-type wavefunction that corresponds to a real potential.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Looks like no one's interested in this... I did some calculations myself. Let's say \phi(x)=f(x)+ig(x), where ##f## and ##g## are real functions. Now we have

V(x)=-\frac{k^{2}}{2}+ik\frac{\phi'(x)}{\phi(x)}+\frac{\phi''(x)}{2\phi(x)}\\=-\frac{k^{2}}{2}+k\frac{f'(x)g(x)-g'(x)f(x)}{[f(x)]^{2}+[g(x)]^{2}}+\frac{1}{2}\frac{f''(x)f(x)-g''(x)f(x)}{[f(x)]^{2}+[g(x)]^{2}}+i\left(k\frac{f'(x)f(x)+g'(x)g(x)}{[f(x)]^{2}+[g(x)]^{2}}+\frac{1}{2}\frac{g''(x)f(x)-f''(x)g(x)}{[f(x)]^{2}+[g(x)]^{2}}\right)

and if we want Im\left(V(x)\right)=0, we must have f''(x)g(x)-g''(x)f(x)=2k(f'(x)f(x)+g'(x)g(x)) .

Let's try ##f(x)=sin(x)##. Plugging this in the previous equation, we get a condition for ##g(x)##:

##sin(x)g''(x)+2kg'(x)g(x)+sin(x)g(x)+ksin(2x)=0## .

This is a nonlinear ODE, and Wolfram gave me a terrifyingly complicated solution to it...

Does anyone see a way how we could tell something more about the possible Bloch wavefunctions?
 
If you put your Bloch function into your Schrödinger equation you will find the result is
\tfrac12(p + k)^2 \phi(x) + V(x) \phi(x) = E \phi(x)
so you can see that the value of k is, in a sense, acting as some additional momentum. k is in fact called the pseudomomentum or crystal momentum because of its relationship to the momentum, and that it has a conservation law that is similar to conservation of momentum in that it arises from the translational symmetry of space.

Anyway, physically, solutions where k /= 0 are traveling solutions. These solutions have a non-zero velocity (given by v = \partial E / \partial k). It is fairly straightforward to prove that any wavefunction which is purely real, or can be made purely real by application of a constant phase factor, is stationary, and any wavefunction which is complex in a non-trivial way is not stationary. So these wavefunctions with k /= 0 have to be complex.
 
Thanks for your reply. One can't a priori say that ##\phi(x)## has to be complex-valued for the full wave function to correspond to an unbound state. For example, if \phi(x)=1, the full wavefunction becomes \psi(x)=e^{ikx}\times 1=e^{ikx} which is not a real function or a stationary state.

What I'm after here, is an example of a function ##\phi(x)## that

a) is periodic
b) corresponds to a real valued potential V(x) and
c) has a simple enough functional form that I can actually write it down and show to someone
 
I sort of see what you're asking here. But first let me point out that your example satisfies all those conditions. Of course, the potential ends up being a constant.

Except for when k = 0, whether \phi(x) is real or complex is generally unimportant, since the wavefunction \psi(x) will be complex.

The thing that makes this unimportant is that you will have a single potential for all your electrons.
Your good quantum numbers are the pseudomomentum k and a band index n, and you will generally have occupied states at every allowed value of k. All values of k from -pi/a to pi/a are relevant. While you may find, for some potential, that at some value of k /= 0 that phi(x) is real, phi(x) at another k won't be real. You have the differential equation which gives you the potential that satisfies phi(x) is real at some k, surely you can see that at a different k you will have a different potential. But this doesn't correspond to a real situation which is interesting in solid-state physics.

AFAIK, there is no good example of a simple solution to the Bloch equation. I've never seen any example in a textbook. Even with the simplest periodic potential of V(x) = sin(x) you get a rather difficult to solve equation for \phi(x).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
7K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
8K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K