How Do Charge Distributions Affect Electric Fields in Capacitors?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the charge distribution and electric field behavior in an ideal infinite parallel-plate capacitor. When connected to a battery with emf EMF, charge flows between the plates, creating a potential difference. The conditions for the electric field to vanish within the plates are defined by the equations σ_a - σ_b - σ_c - σ_d = 0 for plate I and -σ_a - σ_b - σ_c + σ_d = 0 for plate II. Understanding these relationships is crucial for analyzing electric fields in capacitors.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electric fields and charge distributions
  • Familiarity with the concept of surface charge density (σ)
  • Knowledge of the properties of perfect conductors
  • Basic grasp of capacitor functionality and behavior
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of electric fields from surface charge densities in capacitors
  • Learn about the implications of non-ideal capacitors on charge distribution
  • Explore the concept of electric field lines and their representation
  • Investigate the effects of dielectric materials on capacitor performance
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physics students, electrical engineers, and anyone studying electrostatics or capacitor design and analysis.

forestmine
Messages
201
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Consider a capacitor that consists of two metal plates of nonzero thickness separated by a positive distance d. When such a capacitor is connected across the terminals of a battery with emf EMF, two things happen simultaneously: Charge flows from one plate to another, and a potential difference appears between the two plates.

In this problem, you will determine the amount and distribution of charge on each metallic plate for an ideal (infinite) parallel-plate capacitor. There is competition between the repulsive forces from like charges on a plate and the attractive forces from the opposite charge on the other plate. You will determine which force "wins."

Let sigma_a, sigma_b, sigma_c, and sigma_d be the respective surface charge densities on surfaces A, B, C, and D. Take all the charge densities to be positive for now. Some of them are in fact negative, and this will be revealed at the end of the calculation.

185287.jpg


If we assume that the metallic plates are perfect conductors, the electric field in their interiors must vanish. Given that the electric field E_vec due to a charged sheet with surface charge + \sigma is given by

E = σ/2ε_0

and that it points away from the plane of the sheet, how can the condition that the electric field in plate I vanishes be written?

ANSWER: σ_a - σ_b - σ_c - σ_d = 0

Similarly, how can the condition that the electric field in plate II vanishes be written?

ANSWER: -σ_a - σ_b - σ_c + σ_d=0

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



For Part A, my first thought was to consider the fields lines emanating from each plate as vectors (in a way). For instance, if the top A holds a positive charge, the field lines will point up away from the top of the plate, and down out of the bottom plate, therefore, σ_a+σ_b = 0, but right off the bat, that is wrong. Also, it says in the intro to consider all the σ 's as being positive, so in that case, the field lines point out of both plates?

I'm honestly completely confused about how to arrive at those answers, so some conceptual guiding would be greatly appreciated!

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
forestmine said:

Homework Statement


Consider a capacitor that consists of two metal plates of nonzero thickness separated by a positive distance d. When such a capacitor is connected across the terminals of a battery with emf EMF, two things happen simultaneously: Charge flows from one plate to another, and a potential difference appears between the two plates.

In this problem, you will determine the amount and distribution of charge on each metallic plate for an ideal (infinite) parallel-plate capacitor. There is competition between the repulsive forces from like charges on a plate and the attractive forces from the opposite charge on the other plate. You will determine which force "wins."

Let sigma_a, sigma_b, sigma_c, and sigma_d be the respective surface charge densities on surfaces A, B, C, and D. Take all the charge densities to be positive for now. Some of them are in fact negative, and this will be revealed at the end of the calculation.

185287.jpg


If we assume that the metallic plates are perfect conductors, the electric field in their interiors must vanish. Given that the electric field E_vec due to a charged sheet with surface charge + \sigma is given by

E = σ/2ε_0

and that it points away from the plane of the sheet, how can the condition that the electric field in plate I vanishes be written?

ANSWER: σ_a - σ_b - σ_c - σ_d = 0

Similarly, how can the condition that the electric field in plate II vanishes be written?

ANSWER: -σ_a - σ_b - σ_c + σ_d=0

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



For Part A, my first thought was to consider the fields lines emanating from each plate as vectors (in a way). For instance, if the top A holds a positive charge, the field lines will point up away from the top of the plate, and down out of the bottom plate, therefore, σ_a+σ_b = 0, but right off the bat, that is wrong. Also, it says in the intro to consider all the σ 's as being positive, so in that case, the field lines point out of both plates?

I'm honestly completely confused about how to arrive at those answers, so some conceptual guiding would be greatly appreciated!

Thanks!
electric field is a vector quantity so think about it's direction. if you are thinking for electric field inside the I plate then all the charges in lower of plate will have electric field (sigma_b+sigma_c+sigma_d)/2e(in upward direction)[/color] but the direction of electric field due charges in upper section of uppermost will have opposite direction of electric field that is -[/color]sigma_a/2e(add all to get zero). that's why it is negative and all other are positive.
I ask similar question to my self when i was learning capacitors(~2months ago). after thinking i reach to above conclusion which look to be correct..
 
I think I was thinking about this all wrong.

I think I've got it now.

Thanks for the help!
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
3K