How do crumple zones help in reducing the impact of a car crash on passengers?

  • Thread starter Thread starter bubblez
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Car Physics
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Crumple zones in vehicles are designed to absorb kinetic energy during a collision, thereby reducing the force transmitted to passengers. This absorption allows for a more gradual change in momentum, minimizing the shock experienced by occupants. The effectiveness of crumple zones is contingent upon the use of seat belts, which further restrain passengers during a crash. Understanding the relationship between impulse and momentum is crucial, as impulse is the change in momentum over time, and a lower rate of change (dp/dt) results in reduced force felt by passengers.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic physics concepts such as momentum and impulse
  • Familiarity with the principles of energy absorption in vehicle design
  • Knowledge of the role of seat belts in crash safety
  • Basic comprehension of Newton's laws of motion
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the physics of momentum and impulse in greater detail
  • Explore the engineering principles behind crumple zone design in modern vehicles
  • Study the effectiveness of seat belts in conjunction with crumple zones during collisions
  • Investigate advancements in automotive safety technology beyond crumple zones
USEFUL FOR

Automotive engineers, safety researchers, physics students, and anyone interested in vehicle safety and crash dynamics will benefit from this discussion.

bubblez
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Physics of Car Crashes HELP PLZ :)

hello!
okay I've got an assignment due tomorrow and would very much like some help please!

is this right:
crumple zones absrob energy that is supposed to be transmitted to the passenger and therefore because it absrobs the energy the passenger does not usffer such a huge shock when the car crashes?

whats a dependent and controlled variable?

and is umpulse and momentum the same?

thanks so much! :biggrin:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
all i can say that this thing is right
"crumple zones absrob energy that is supposed to be transmitted to the passenger and therefore because it absrobs the energy the passenger does not usffer such a huge shock when the car crashes?"
 
bubblez said:
whats a dependent and controlled variable?

and is umpulse and momentum the same?

a dependent and controlled variable in the context of the rest of your post, or just in general?

As far as impulse and momentum go: they are not the same thing, but they do have to do with each other.

Momentum is the mass of something multiplied by its velocity.
So if you're falling and you want your momentum at impact you multiply your mass times your velocity when you hit the ground.

Impulse is the change in momentum divided by the change in time.
So when you hit the ground after your fall, your momentum goes from something-or-another to zero (because you stop moving in the end). You can adjust how much the fall will hurt by bending your knees when you fall, giving yourself a longer time to go from yes-momentum to no-momentum.

I hope that helps a little. I think I should've used numbers and letters (it really does make more sense that way!) but they scare a lot of people, so I opted for words instead. Sorry!
 
Suppose a car drives against a wall which brings it to a grinding halt.
The total change in kinetic energy is the same whether you have a crumple zone or not (the impulse \int F(t)dt is the same).
What a crumple zone accomplished is that the momentum changes more or less gruadually (recall that dp/dt equals force).
If dp/dt is low, you won't feel so great a shock.
You will get thrown forward with the speed you were going before banging against the wall, but because of the safety belts, you'll be kept in your chair. The force the belts apply to your body are lowest when the contact with the wall is as long as possible. (Crumple zones really don't help if you don't wear safety belts).

So I think it's wrong to say the crumple zone absorbs energy which would otherwise be transmitted to the passenger.
 
Last edited:
Let dp/dt equal the change the rate of change of momentum over time.

Then,

You could say that \int\lim_{dp\rightarrow dt} = 0.
 
Ok, I'll try to explain it better.

There is something called inertia, momentum is carried by inertia. Inertia is the resistance and will for something to move until an outer force stops it. That basically means something will move if some force effects it, and something will only stop if some force stops (i.e friction, gravity, etc.)

When you drive a car down the road, with a seal belt or not, there is a great deal of momentum involved due to the speed. The more massive the object in motion the greater the momentum.

Remember, for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction.

So, I'm driving my car without a seat belt on at 50 MPH, suddenly I slam the breaks on to avoid a crash and come to a halt. What happens is your body continues to move at the speed of the car when you slammed on the breaks.

The only difference is when you wear a seat belt it holds you back, otherwise, you'd go straight though the window!

Remember, you're going 50 MPH, so if you slam the breaks on, the forces will be violent since you're going from 50 MPH to 0. Why? Because it took an amount of force and time to accelerate you to 50 MPH, what comes in comes out. Therefore It will take the same amount of force to stop you, and when you stop so suddenly, those forces can't work as well because it took you longer to get to 50 MPH then it did to stop.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
7K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
11K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
14K